Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] OT barycenters for generic transport costs #715

Open
wants to merge 17 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

eloitanguy
Copy link
Collaborator

@eloitanguy eloitanguy commented Jan 20, 2025

Types of changes

  • contribute a generalisation of free_support that accepts any cost function (implements this paper)
  • contribute a specific version of this function in ot.gmm for fast computation of GMM barycenters
  • example for new barycenter function
  • example of GMM barycenters
  • add summary of features and example in README.md

Motivation and context / Related issue

How has this been tested (if it applies)

  • full coverage in test/test_ot.py and test/test_gmm.py

PR checklist

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • The documentation is up-to-date with the changes I made (check build artifacts).
  • All tests passed, and additional code has been covered with new tests.
  • I have added the PR and Issue fix to the RELEASES.md file.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the ot.lp label Jan 20, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 20, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 9.09091% with 30 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 96.93%. Comparing base (a11b055) to head (6a3eab5).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #715      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.08%   96.93%   -0.15%     
==========================================
  Files         100      100              
  Lines       19947    19979      +32     
==========================================
+ Hits        19365    19367       +2     
- Misses        582      612      +30     

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants