-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Out to WaitBuilder #1
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent changes introduce a new method Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant WaitBuilder
participant Task
User->>WaitBuilder: call Output(output map[string]any)
WaitBuilder->>Task: set output with provided map
Task-->>WaitBuilder: output set confirmation
WaitBuilder-->>User: return WaitBuilder instance
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- builtin/wait.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
builtin/wait.go (1)
91-94
: TheOut
method correctly sets the output map to theWait
task'sInput.Output
. Ensure that theExpr
type is properly handled elsewhere in the code.Verification successful
The
Expr
type is defined and used extensively throughout the codebase, including in thebuiltin/wait.go
file. TheWaitBuilder
struct and its methods, includingOut
, are correctly implemented to handle theExpr
type.
- The
Expr
type is defined indecoder.go
and is used in various files such asbuiltin/wait.go
,builtin/terminate.go
,builtin/http.go
, and others.- The
Out
method inWaitBuilder
sets theOutput
field to anExpr
type, which is consistent with other usages in the codebase.This confirms that the
Expr
type is properly handled in theOut
method and throughout the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the `Expr` type is properly handled in all usages of `WaitBuilder.Out`. # Test: Search for the usage of `WaitBuilder.Out` and check the handling of `Expr` type. rg --type go $'WaitBuilder.Out'Length of output: 30
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find the definition of the `WaitBuilder` struct and its methods. # Search for the definition of `WaitBuilder`. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'type WaitBuilder struct { $$$ }' # Search for methods of `WaitBuilder`. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (b *WaitBuilder) $_($$$_) $_ { $$$ }' # Search for the definition and usage of the `Expr` type. rg --type go 'type Expr' rg --type go 'Expr'Length of output: 5573
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- builtin/wait.go (1 hunks)
Additional context used
golangci-lint
GitHub Check: Unit Testing (ubuntu-latest)
builtin/wait.go
[failure] 93-93:
undefined: c
GitHub Check: Lint
builtin/wait.go
[failure] 93-93:
undefined: c) (typecheck)
GitHub Check: Unit Testing (macOS-latest)
builtin/wait.go
[failure] 93-93:
undefined: c
Additional comments not posted (1)
builtin/wait.go (1)
91-94
: The implementation of theOut
method correctly sets the output for theWait
task.Tools
GitHub Check: Unit Testing (ubuntu-latest)
[failure] 93-93:
undefined: cGitHub Check: Lint
[failure] 93-93:
undefined: c) (typecheck)GitHub Check: Unit Testing (macOS-latest)
[failure] 93-93:
undefined: c
builtin/wait.go
Outdated
func (b *WaitBuilder) Out(out map[string]any) *WaitBuilder { | ||
b.task.Input.Output = orchestrator.Expr[map[string]any]{Expr: out} | ||
return c | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fix the typo in the return statement of the Out
method.
There is a typo on line 93 where c
is used instead of b
. This causes an undefined variable error as reported by the static analysis tools.
- return c
+ return b
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
func (b *WaitBuilder) Out(out map[string]any) *WaitBuilder { | |
b.task.Input.Output = orchestrator.Expr[map[string]any]{Expr: out} | |
return c | |
} | |
func (b *WaitBuilder) Out(out map[string]any) *WaitBuilder { | |
b.task.Input.Output = orchestrator.Expr[map[string]any]{Expr: out} | |
return b | |
} |
Tools
GitHub Check: Unit Testing (ubuntu-latest)
[failure] 93-93:
undefined: c
GitHub Check: Lint
[failure] 93-93:
undefined: c) (typecheck)
GitHub Check: Unit Testing (macOS-latest)
[failure] 93-93:
undefined: c
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@coderabbitai Is there any other issue?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@RussellLuo Based on the analysis, there are no additional issues found in the builtin/wait.go
file. The functions are correctly defined, and there are no TODO or FIXME comments indicating pending issues. The only issue was the typo in the return statement of the Out
method, which has been addressed.
Analysis chain
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for syntax errors and common issues in the builtin/wait.go file.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func $_($_) $_ {
$$$
}' builtin/wait.go
# Check for any TODO or FIXME comments in the builtin/wait.go file.
rg 'TODO|FIXME' builtin/wait.go
Length of output: 451
fdf4e75
to
62a45a2
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- builtin/wait.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- builtin/wait.go
b.task.Input.Output = orchestrator.Expr[map[string]any]{Expr: output} | ||
return b | ||
} | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@RussellLuo, here's the unit testing code for the builtin/wait.go
file, focusing on the WaitBuilder
and Wait
structs:
package builtin_test
import (
"context"
"testing"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
"github.com/RussellLuo/orchestrator/builtin"
"github.com/RussellLuo/orchestrator"
)
func TestWaitBuilder_Output(t *testing.T) {
builder := builtin.NewWait("testWait")
outputMap := map[string]any{"key": "value"}
resultBuilder := builder.Output(outputMap)
assert.Equal(t, outputMap, resultBuilder.Task.Input.Output.Expr, "Output should set the output map correctly")
}
func TestWaitBuilder_Build(t *testing.T) {
builder := builtin.NewWait("testWait")
resultTask := builder.Build()
assert.IsType(t, &builtin.Wait{}, resultTask, "Build should return a Wait task")
assert.Equal(t, "testWait", resultTask.Name, "Task name should be set correctly")
}
func TestWait_Execute(t *testing.T) {
ctx := context.Background()
input := orchestrator.Input{}
task := &builtin.Wait{
TaskHeader: orchestrator.TaskHeader{Name: "testWait", Type: "wait"},
}
// Mock behavior
behavior := &mockActorBehavior{}
input.Set("actor", map[string]any{"behavior": behavior})
output, err := task.Execute(ctx, input)
assert.Nil(t, err, "Should handle nil input without error")
assert.NotNil(t, output, "Should return an output")
}
// Mock ActorBehavior for testing
type mockActorBehavior struct {
orchestrator.ActorBehavior
}
func (m *mockActorBehavior) Send(data map[string]any, err error) {
// Mock sending data
}
func (m *mockActorBehavior) Receive() map[string]any {
// Mock receiving data
return map[string]any{"key": "value"}
}
This includes basic tests for the Output
and Build
methods of WaitBuilder
, and a more complex test for the Execute
method of Wait
, which involves mocking the ActorBehavior
. You might need to adjust the mock implementations based on the actual behavior and interfaces in your application.
Summary by CodeRabbit