Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: first jsonld context #2

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

thomasBousselin
Copy link
Member

@thomasBousselin thomasBousselin commented Jan 13, 2025

This will deploy a common jsonld context to use when interacting with NGSILD Brokers.
The content of the context is based on this document

The content of the context should probably be discussed further.
Examples of potential discussions are :

broker/README.md Outdated
]
}
}
}
Copy link
Member Author

@thomasBousselin thomasBousselin Jan 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"wasGeneratedBy","used","processingSteps" and "relatedAssets" are not in this example because ListRelationships are recent addition to the NGSILD specification and not yet implemented in stellio. (some workaround exist)
We may also try to prioritize implementation of ListRelationShip if needed.

Other issue with "wasGeneratedBy" and "used" is that they are relationship with dcat "Activity" which is not yet defiined in the context.

"type": "GeoProperty",
"value": "this is what my endpoint do"
},
"geometry": {
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"geometry" property could be name "location" as "location" is already defined in the NGSILD core context.

@thomasBousselin thomasBousselin self-assigned this Jan 14, 2025
@thomasBousselin
Copy link
Member Author

@xamcost FYI.

@xamcost
Copy link

xamcost commented Jan 14, 2025

Awesome, thank you @thomasBousselin ! I'll try with the broker instance we deployed in our cluster once it is merged, and will keep you posted. Thanks!

@thomasBousselin
Copy link
Member Author

thomasBousselin commented Jan 17, 2025

As discussed i added it to a new repo : Sedimark/broker

Not sure why u added a commit to this branch. If you changed your mind and prefer to merge it here i can still delete my repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants