Cut-4468-cascade-manager-remove-jc-user

[kmaranionjc]

Issues

• Cut-4468 - Cut-4468-cascade-manager-remove-jc-user

What does this solve?

Adds functionality for cascading manager with Remove-JCUser

Is there anything particularly tricky?

n/a

How should this be tested?

Remove-JCUser -UserId id

• Delete a user/manager. If the user is a manager, there will be prompts to cascade the manager of the users
  
• Delete manager1 that is managed by manager2. Instead of cascading the users manager to manager2. Enter a different user id to manage the managed users.
  
• Delete manager1 that is managed by manager2. Cascade the manager2 to managed users
  

Remove-JCUser -UserId id -force

• Remove a user(manager) with force param. This should set its managed users manager to null

Remove-JCUser -UserId id -force -CascadeManager user -CascadeManagerUser testUser

• Should throw an error. CascadeManager and force is not allowed

Remove-JCUser -UserId id -CascadeManager User -CascadeManagerUser Username/Id

• Remove a user (manager). Managed users manager should be the given Cascade Manager

Remove-JCUser -UserId id -CascadeManager auto

• Setup manager1 that is managed by manager2. This command should automatically cascade the manager of the managed users of manager1 to manager2 and remove/delete manager1

Remove-JCUser -UserId id -CascadeManager null

• Remove a user/manager. It's managed users should have no manager after removal.

Screenshots

[jworkmanjc]

Let's chat about this as a team, I think there are a few changes that have to be made, there are a few changes that could be made to make this more readable.

[gweinjc]

I believe we need to change the branch to be merged into CUT-4394_JCDeviceFromCSV instead of master if we intend to release both features

Also when testing, there isn't any feedback whether or not the manager was actually cascaded or not, some kind of output might be beneficial to customers showcasing that the new manager assignment took place

[jworkmanjc]

Just a few wording updates in the examples really, otherwise I think this is okay