Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat: add rbs support #123

Draft
wants to merge 14 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Feat: add rbs support #123

wants to merge 14 commits into from

Conversation

rarruda
Copy link
Collaborator

@rarruda rarruda commented Nov 15, 2022

About the changes

Add support for type checking/hinting in the SDK.

Should be quite helpful for users if they have a powerful IDE, and for developers to ensure that we correctly handle the correct types in methods, etc.

Important files

Discussion points

Not sure if all the essential client-code is yet in place.

Basic testing is however in place via github actions / steep

@rarruda rarruda added the pinned Should not go stale label Nov 25, 2022
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Nov 26, 2022

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 12877559180

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 95.374%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 12670653058: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 433
Relevant Lines: 454

💛 - Coveralls

TODO:
- add rbs to gemspec
- add rbs tests to gha
- add rbs tests
- consider checking using steep / Steepfile
- added steep and rbs to gemspec
- added type signature tests to github actions
- updated Steepfile
apparently i don't run all tests in all platforms locally
@rarruda
Copy link
Collaborator Author

rarruda commented Jan 21, 2025

Note: worth while considering: https://github.com/soutaro/rbs-inline

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pinned Should not go stale
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants