Chore: Only import submodules at type checking level #553
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@aaronsteers has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 7 minutes and 20 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on restructuring import statements across multiple Changes
Possibly related PRs
What do you think about these related PRs? Should we keep an eye on them for consistency? Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
airbyte/cloud/__init__.py (2)
72-72: Minor: Extra blank line - wdyt about removing it?There's an extra blank line here that could be removed to maintain consistency with other module files.
Line range hint
6-7: Great architectural approach for handling type hints! 🎉The consistent use of TYPE_CHECKING across modules effectively solves the pdoc documentation issue while maintaining proper type hints. This approach:
- Prevents circular imports
- Reduces runtime overhead
- Maintains full type checking capabilities
- Keeps the documentation generator happy
The implementation follows Python best practices and is consistently applied across all modules.
Also applies to: 20-26
airbyte/__init__.py (2)
144-162: Nice comprehensive type checking imports! A few thoughts...The implementation looks clean and well-documented. I noticed a few interesting points:
The comment about
clicausing circular imports - would it make sense to document this in a more visible place (like README or developer docs) to prevent future confusion?For the exceptions import, you've added a comment about not using 'exc' alias. Have you considered moving this to a linter configuration instead? wdyt?
126-127: Consider adding a docstring explaining the TYPE_CHECKING patternSince this is the main
__init__.py, would it be helpful to add a brief docstring explaining why we're using TYPE_CHECKING for these imports? This could help other contributors understand the pattern. wdyt?Also applies to: 143-144
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
airbyte/__init__.py(2 hunks)airbyte/caches/__init__.py(2 hunks)airbyte/cloud/__init__.py(1 hunks)airbyte/destinations/__init__.py(1 hunks)airbyte/secrets/__init__.py(2 hunks)airbyte/sources/__init__.py(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- airbyte/secrets/init.py
🔇 Additional comments (4)
airbyte/sources/__init__.py (1)
20-26: LGTM! Clean implementation of TYPE_CHECKING imports 👍
The conditional imports are well-structured and the comment explaining the pdoc issue is helpful. The ruff noqa comment is appropriate here since these imports are indeed used for more than just type checking.
airbyte/caches/__init__.py (1)
17-20: LGTM! Consistent implementation with other modules 👌
The TYPE_CHECKING imports are well-organized and follow the same pattern as other modules. The comment and structure maintain consistency across the codebase.
airbyte/cloud/__init__.py (1)
67-71: LGTM! Clean implementation matching other modules 🎯
The TYPE_CHECKING implementation is consistent with other modules and maintains the same documentation pattern.
airbyte/destinations/__init__.py (1)
78-91: Consider verifying runtime usage of util module
The change to import util only during type checking looks good and aligns with the PR objective. However, could we verify that util is only used for type hints in this module? If it's used at runtime, we might need to keep a regular import as well. wdyt?
✅ Verification successful
The util module import looks correct as is
Looking at the file content, I can see that:
- The
utilmodule is imported normally for its functions (get_destination,get_noop_destination) which are used at runtime and exported via__all__ - The TYPE_CHECKING import of the entire
utilmodule is only for documentation purposes (as commented) and type hints - The implementation correctly maintains both runtime functionality and type checking/documentation needs
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any runtime usage of util module in this file
rg -U "util\.[a-zA-Z_]+" airbyte/destinations/__init__.py
Length of output: 59
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the entire content of the file to understand the context better
cat airbyte/destinations/__init__.py
# Also check for any imports from util module in the file
rg "from airbyte\.destinations\.util import" airbyte/destinations/__init__.py
Length of output: 3237
aaronsteers
changed the title
aaronsteers
deleted the
aj/chore/only-import-submodules-at-type-checking-level
branch
Related to:
This PR moves all imports of submodules to their parent modules under
if TYPE_CHECKING: ...conditional blocks. This seems to satisfypdocwhile not having the runtime implications or risk of circular dependency issues.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Bug Fixes