[#6306] fix(authz): Fix the OOM of JdbcAuthorizationPlugin #6312
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
yuqi1129
approved these changes
Jan 17, 2025
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 17, 2025
### What changes were proposed in this pull request? Fix the OOM of JdbcAuthorizationPlugin. In old implement, we will call roleUpdate in the roleCreate. We will repeated call, they will cause oom. ### Why are the changes needed? Fix: #6306 ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? Added a new UT.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix the OOM of JdbcAuthorizationPlugin. In old implement, we will call roleUpdate in the roleCreate. We will repeated call, they will cause oom.
Why are the changes needed?
Fix: #6306
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
How was this patch tested?
Added a new UT.