Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NIFI-3785: Added feature to move controller services between process … #8965

Open
wants to merge 11 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Freedom9339
Copy link
Contributor

@Freedom9339 Freedom9339 commented Jun 13, 2024

…groups with the new UI

Summary

NIFI-3785: Added an option on the controller services grid that moves a controller service to a specified process group. The controller service can be moved to the parent process group or a child process group. However, it can only be moved one level at a time. If there are any scope conflicts with referencing components, the move will fail displaying the reason.

Tracking

Please complete the following tracking steps prior to pull request creation.

Issue Tracking

Pull Request Tracking

  • Pull Request title starts with Apache NiFi Jira issue number, such as NIFI-00000
  • Pull Request commit message starts with Apache NiFi Jira issue number, as such NIFI-00000

Pull Request Formatting

  • Pull Request based on current revision of the main branch
  • Pull Request refers to a feature branch with one commit containing changes

Verification

Please indicate the verification steps performed prior to pull request creation.

Build

  • Build completed using mvn clean install -P contrib-check
    • JDK 21

Licensing

  • New dependencies are compatible with the Apache License 2.0 according to the License Policy
  • New dependencies are documented in applicable LICENSE and NOTICE files

Documentation

  • Documentation formatting appears as expected in rendered files

@Freedom9339
Copy link
Contributor Author

@markap14 @exceptionfactory I've resubmitted this PR with the changes done to the new UI. The backend is the same as it was in the closed PR(#7734), but the UI changes were done against the new UI.

@ChrisSamo632 ChrisSamo632 changed the title NIFI-3785.1: Added feature to move controller services between process … NIFI-3785: Added feature to move controller services between process … Jun 13, 2024
@Freedom9339
Copy link
Contributor Author

@markobean

@exceptionfactory
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for putting in the work to refactor this for the new UI @Freedom9339.

Tagging @mcgilman and @rfellows for potential review.

@mcgilman
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the mention @exceptionfactory! I'll have a look...

@mcgilman mcgilman self-requested a review June 14, 2024 21:54
Copy link
Contributor

@mcgilman mcgilman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR @Freedom9339! I've left a number of comments below that mostly appear to be from using the Enable/Disable Service dialog has a starting point. Since that dialog needs to be used for both Services in the Flow and in the Controller Settings there area a number of considerations there that are not needed here.

In addition to the items below, please ensure you run prettier and that this PR isn't introducing any new lint issues (I think there are currently 31 left that we're slowly trying to work through). From nifi/nifi-frontend/src/main/frontend please run:

$ npx nx prettier:format
$ npx nx lint

I will defer to @exceptionfactory or @markap14 for a more thorough review of the back end changes.

@mcgilman mcgilman added the new ui Pull requests for work relating to the new user interface being developed. label Jun 20, 2024
@Freedom9339 Freedom9339 requested a review from mcgilman June 27, 2024 12:36
@Freedom9339
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mcgilman Just checking in. Any updates on this?

@mcgilman
Copy link
Contributor

@mcgilman Just checking in. Any updates on this?

Thanks for the ping. Sorry for the delay, I'll try to get some more eyes on this PR this week.

@Freedom9339
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mcgilman Sorry the pinging again. Just want to make sure this doesn't fall through the cracks.

@mcgilman
Copy link
Contributor

@mcgilman Sorry the pinging again. Just want to make sure this doesn't fall through the cracks.

I just pulled down the latest. After rebasing against current main there were build failures due to changes that have landed after your PR was created. So I tried to run the PR as-is without rebasing and I'm still seeing issues. When running through the dev server it fails to serve with

Application bundle generation failed. [13.461 seconds]

✘ [ERROR] Undefined function.

109 │ $surface-light-palette: mat.define-palette($surface-palette, 600, 100, 900);
│ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

libs/shared/src/assets/themes/supplemental.scss 109:25 @import
apps/nifi/src/styles.scss 62:9 root stylesheet [plugin angular-sass]

angular:styles/global:styles:1:8:
  1 │ @import 'apps/nifi/src/styles.scss';

I then tried running with the built application but I'm seeing this error in dev tools when attempting to open the MoveControllerService Component.

TypeError: g is not iterable
    at chunk-VIZEOFFB.js:70:66450
    at Array.forEach (<anonymous>)
    at o.loadChildOptions (chunk-VIZEOFFB.js:70:66333)
    at new o (chunk-VIZEOFFB.js:70:65423)
    at o.ɵfac [as factory] (chunk-VIZEOFFB.js:70:67428)
    at hn (chunk-ZKVQE3GD.js:7:23746)
    at TC (chunk-ZKVQE3GD.js:7:63202)
    at mn.create (chunk-ZKVQE3GD.js:7:61795)
    at Vg.createComponent (chunk-ZKVQE3GD.js:7:64954)
    at t.attachComponentPortal (chunk-6XYXU2WR.js:1:110675)

Once the PR is updated I should be able to get some more eyes on it quickly.

@Freedom9339
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mcgilman I fixed the issue caused by rebasing and pushed. Thank You!

Copy link
Contributor

@mcgilman mcgilman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the rebase! I've left some additional feedback below.

@Freedom9339
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mcgilman I've completed the change/fixes requested. Thank You!

@Freedom9339
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mcgilman Sorry, I just realized my latest commit didn't go through. It's there now.

@Freedom9339
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mcgilman Any update on this? I just did a fresh rebase.

Copy link
Contributor

@mcgilman mcgilman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the updates @Freedom9339! I've left a few more comments below.

@Freedom9339
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mcgilman Thank you for the review. I've made the requested changes. Thank You.

Copy link
Contributor

@mcgilman mcgilman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Freedom9339 Thanks again for the updates! It's looking good. I've left a couple comments and I've noted a number of nit-picky coding style things to better follow some of the conventions currently practiced.


// build the form
this.moveControllerServiceForm = this.formBuilder.group({
processGroups: new FormControl('Process Group', Validators.required)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Process Group is not a valid value for this field. We could initialize the value to null but we're setting the value below. We could instead determine the value before creating the form and then just use the correct value when creating the FormControl.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure what you mean by this. "Process Group" is what is shown whenever there is no process group selected. The only time this happens is if there are no valid process groups available.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The first argument to the FormControl is the value. The string Process Group is not a valid value. What you see in the control when no value is select comes from the mat-label in the mat-form-field. If you want something else than the mat-label value you can specify a placeholder on the mat-select.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see. I've removed the initial value.

@Freedom9339 Freedom9339 force-pushed the nifi-3785.1 branch 2 times, most recently from 59ef48f to 47df567 Compare October 28, 2024 17:15
Copy link
Contributor

@mcgilman mcgilman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the updates @Freedom9339. I've left a few comments below. I didn't call out a specific line but the new move-options endpoint should not be providing options and exposing details for parent or child Process Groups that the end user does not have permissions to. Please ensure your trying out all these scenarios when your PR changes.

Thanks!

Comment on lines 50 to 54
export const selectProcessGroupFlow = createSelector(
selectFlowState,
(state: FlowState) => state.flow.processGroupFlow
);

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is no longer used and can be removed.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removed.

import {
ControllerServiceEntity,
ControllerServiceReferencingComponent,
ControllerServiceReferencingComponentEntity
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is unused and is causing a lint warning.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removed.

import { NifiSpinnerDirective } from 'apps/nifi/src/app/ui/common/spinner/nifi-spinner.directive';
import { MoveControllerServiceDialogRequestSuccess } from '../../../state/controller-services';
import { moveControllerService } from '../../../state/controller-services/controller-services.actions';
import { BreadcrumbEntity } from '../../../state/shared';
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is unused and is causing a lint warning.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removed.

controllerServiceDTO.getReferencingComponents().forEach(e -> {
if (processGroup.getProcessGroup().findProcessor(e.getId()) == null
&& processGroup.getProcessGroup().findControllerService(e.getId(), true, false) == null) {
conflictingComponents.add("[" + e.getComponent().getName() + "]");
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If I take away permissions from a component that references the Service I'm trying to remove this line generates a NullPointerException

2024-11-18 16:04:51,256 ERROR [NiFi Web Server-76] o.a.nifi.web.api.config.ThrowableMapper An unexpected error has occurred: java.lang.NullPointerException: Cannot invoke "org.apache.nifi.web.api.dto.ControllerServiceReferencingComponentDTO.getName()" because the return value of "org.apache.nifi.web.api.entity.ControllerServiceReferencingComponentEntity.getComponent()" is null. Returning Internal Server Error response.
java.lang.NullPointerException: Cannot invoke "org.apache.nifi.web.api.dto.ControllerServiceReferencingComponentDTO.getName()" because the return value of "org.apache.nifi.web.api.entity.ControllerServiceReferencingComponentEntity.getComponent()" is null
    at org.apache.nifi.web.api.ControllerServiceResource.lambda$generateProcessGroupOption$18(ControllerServiceResource.java:751)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed.

selector: 'move-controller-service',
standalone: true,
templateUrl: './move-controller-service.component.html',
imports: [
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A number of the imports below are no longer used. Once they are removed from here, please ensure the the corresponding import above is removed.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removed unused imports.

@Freedom9339
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mcgilman Sorry for the delay. I addressed the issues you mentioned and added more user validation to not expose any unauthorized components. I've tested every scenario I could think of. Please let me know if there is one I missed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
new ui Pull requests for work relating to the new user interface being developed.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants