resolve conflict with thing7

_things/thing-07.md

@@ -20,13 +20,12 @@ work and ideas. Along with books, journals and other scholarly works, it
 is now possible to formally cite research datasets and even the software
 that was used to create or analyse the data.
 
-1.  Start by looking back to the [Weddell Seal
-    dataset](https://researchdata.ands.org.au/measuring-effects-human-leptonychotes-weddellii/699460 "Wendell seal dataset")
-    we explored in Thing 4.  Check out how many times it has been cited.
+1.  Start by looking at the [Weddell Seal
+    dataset](https://researchdata.ands.org.au/measuring-effects-human-leptonychotes-weddellii/699460 "Wendell seal    dataset"). Check out how many times it has been cited.
     This citation count has been measured by Thomson Reuters Data
     Citation Index product.
-2.  Scan through the ANDS introduction to [data
-    citation](https://www.ands.org.au/working-with-data/citation-and-identifiers/data-citation "data citation")
+2.  Scan through the ARDC introduction to [data
+    citation](https://ardc.edu.au/resources/working-with-data/citation-identifiers/data-citation/ "data citation")
 3.  Now look at the [Hutchinson Drought
     Index](https://researchdata.ands.org.au/monthly-drought-australia-drought-index/61872 "Hutchinson drought index")
     data record in Research Data Australia. This research data makes
@@ -95,4 +94,4 @@ passenger dataset they have provided.
 
 2\. What is your opinion about whether publishing data as a visualisation
 is likely to make the data more or less accessible, reusable and
-therefore citable?
+therefore citable?