Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make createMPU Call Async #84
Make createMPU Call Async #84
Changes from 17 commits
0b69912
3ccb2bf
4138450
172a71d
127c04d
0d80baa
7b1a343
4430442
1d8844a
e7ab6cc
ee0c896
b176266
2f31b3c
2b15b62
4ecd5c8
3fec7f4
66268e5
6225e54
7f2a4a4
563e217
9831521
3f4b483
604c6c7
1586187
736fbe4
110fd16
5ef0e52
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
where'd you get the name
initiate()
? Is that a standard name used in similar libraries? Just want to be sure we pick something predictable for usersThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not really, Aaron suggested changing the name from
send
to avoid confusion with the Rust SDK at #73 (comment), and I couldn't think of something better than initiate/send.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if we're changing the name-and-asyncness of
UploadFluentBuilder::send()
then we should change the name-and-asyncness ofUploadInputBuilder::send_with()
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, yeah, I can make it consistent once we have agreed on the
initiate
name in the previous feedback.