✨ Add type guards for events #6
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes introduce new test suites for three functions: Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
src/server/webhooks/events/project/event.ts (1)
8-10: LGTM! Consider adding a JSDoc comment.The
isProjectEventfunction is well-implemented and enhances type safety for project events. It correctly uses the existingisProjectEventKeyfunction, promoting code reuse.Consider adding a JSDoc comment to improve documentation:
+/** + * Type guard to check if an event is a ProjectEvent. + * @param event - The event to check. + * @returns True if the event is a ProjectEvent, false otherwise. + */ export function isProjectEvent(event: Event): event is ProjectEvent { return isProjectEventKey(event.eventKey) }src/server/webhooks/events/pr/event.test.ts (1)
17-27: LGTM: New test suite forisPrEventaddedThe new test suite for
isPrEventis well-structured and covers both positive and negative scenarios. It maintains consistency with the existingisPrEventKeytests.Suggestion for improvement:
Consider adding more test cases to cover edge cases or different types of PR events. This would enhance the robustness of the test suite.Here's an example of an additional test case you could add:
test("pr:declined", ({ expect }) => { const result = isPrEvent({ eventKey: "pr:declined" } as Event) expect(result).toBe(true) })src/server/webhooks/events/repo/event.test.ts (1)
16-28: Good addition of test suite forisRepoEvent, with some suggestions for improvement.The new test suite for
isRepoEventis well-structured and mirrors the existingisRepoEventKeysuite, which is great for consistency. However, I have a few suggestions to enhance the tests:
- Consider using a more type-safe approach instead of type assertion. For example:
const event: Event = { eventKey: "mirror:repo_synchronized" }; const result = isRepoEvent(event);This approach allows TypeScript to catch any mismatches between the
Eventtype and the object you're creating.
It would be beneficial to add more test cases to cover a wider range of event types. This could include edge cases and other valid repo events to ensure comprehensive coverage.
The overall structure and consistency with the existing test suite is commendable and aids in maintainability.
src/server/webhooks/events/project/event.test.ts (1)
17-29: Good addition of tests, but consider enhancing type safety and coverage.The new test suite for
isProjectEventis a valuable addition, covering both positive and negative scenarios. However, there are a few suggestions for improvement:
Instead of using type assertion (
as Event), consider creating a properly typed event object. This will provide better type safety and catch potential issues at compile-time.Add tests for edge cases and invalid inputs to ensure robust function behavior.
Here's an example of how you could improve the tests:
import type { Event } from "../event.js" import { isProjectEvent } from "./event.js" describe("isProjectEvent", () => { test("project:modified", ({ expect }) => { const event: Event = { eventKey: "project:modified" } expect(isProjectEvent(event)).toBe(true) }) test("mirror:repo_synchronized", ({ expect }) => { const event: Event = { eventKey: "mirror:repo_synchronized" } expect(isProjectEvent(event)).toBe(false) }) test("invalid event object", ({ expect }) => { const invalidEvent = { someOtherKey: "value" } expect(isProjectEvent(invalidEvent as any)).toBe(false) }) test("null input", ({ expect }) => { expect(isProjectEvent(null as any)).toBe(false) }) })These changes will improve type safety and increase test coverage for the
isProjectEventfunction.src/server/webhooks/events/repo/event.ts (1)
23-25: LGTM: Well-implemented type guard function.The
isRepoEventfunction is a well-implemented type guard forRepoEvent. It correctly uses the existingisRepoEventKeyfunction and employs a type predicate for proper type narrowing.For improved readability, consider adding a brief JSDoc comment explaining the function's purpose:
+/** + * Type guard to check if an event is a RepoEvent. + * @param event The event to check + * @returns True if the event is a RepoEvent, false otherwise + */ export function isRepoEvent(event: Event): event is RepoEvent { return isRepoEventKey(event.eventKey) }src/server/webhooks/events/pr/event.ts (1)
33-35: LGTM! Consider adding a JSDoc comment.The
isPrEventfunction is well-implemented and enhances type safety. It correctly uses the existingisPrEventKeyfunction and follows the single responsibility principle.Consider adding a JSDoc comment to improve documentation:
+/** + * Type guard to check if an event is a PrEvent. + * @param event - The event to check. + * @returns True if the event is a PrEvent, false otherwise. + */ export function isPrEvent(event: Event): event is PrEvent { return isPrEventKey(event.eventKey) }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/event.test.ts (2 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/event.ts (2 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/project/event.test.ts (2 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/project/event.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/repo/event.test.ts (2 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/repo/event.ts (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
src/server/webhooks/events/project/event.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-23: Excellent addition and integration!The new
isProjectEventfunction is well-integrated with the existing code. It builds upon theisProjectEventKeyfunction and maintains consistency with the codebase's style and patterns. This addition enhances the module's functionality for type-checking project events.src/server/webhooks/events/pr/event.test.ts (2)
2-3: LGTM: Import statements updated correctlyThe import statements have been appropriately updated to include the
Eventtype and theisPrEventfunction, which are necessary for the new test suite.
Line range hint
1-27: Overall assessment: Well-implemented test suite additionThe changes in this file successfully introduce a new test suite for the
isPrEventfunction while maintaining consistency with the existing code structure. The tests cover basic positive and negative scenarios, providing a good foundation for validating the function's behaviour.To further enhance the test coverage, consider adding more test cases for different PR event types and edge cases. This will help ensure the robustness of the
isPrEventfunction across various scenarios.src/server/webhooks/events/repo/event.test.ts (1)
2-3: LGTM: Import statements updated correctly.The import statements have been appropriately updated to include the
Eventtype and theisRepoEventfunction, which are necessary for the new test suite.src/server/webhooks/events/project/event.test.ts (1)
2-3: LGTM! Import statements are correctly updated.The new imports for the
Eventtype andisProjectEventfunction are properly added. The use of thetypekeyword for importingEventis a good TypeScript practice.src/server/webhooks/events/repo/event.ts (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement is correct and necessary.The import statement for the
Eventtype is correctly added and is necessary for the newisRepoEventfunction. Good use of thetypekeyword for a type-only import.
Line range hint
1-25: Summary: Excellent addition of type guard for repo events.The changes in this file are minimal, focused, and well-implemented. The new
isRepoEventfunction serves as a valuable type guard forRepoEvent, enhancing type safety in the codebase. The implementation follows TypeScript best practices and integrates seamlessly with the existing code. Great job on this addition!src/server/webhooks/events/pr/event.ts (1)
33-35: Excellent addition! Verify usage across the codebase.The new
isPrEventfunction is a valuable addition that enhances type safety when working with PR events. It follows existing patterns and doesn't introduce breaking changes.To ensure optimal usage of this new function, please run the following script to check for potential places where it could be applied:
This will help identify areas where the new
isPrEventfunction could be applied to improve type safety and code clarity.
📝 Description
📓 References
Summary by CodeRabbit
isPrEvent,isProjectEvent, andisRepoEventfunctions to enhance event validation.