-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 186
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs:mention uv tool
as an alterative to pipx
#1924
Conversation
Hi @pawamoy any chance for a second review? I think the PR is ready |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks 🙂 Waiting a bit to see what other maintainers think, then I'll merge.
Somehow needed to approve workflows in the Actions tab. |
Huh, and a second time. Might happen when autofix pushes changes. |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1924 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 97.77% 97.95% +0.17%
==========================================
Files 49 49
Lines 5269 5269
==========================================
+ Hits 5152 5161 +9
+ Misses 117 108 -9
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
A small change in the docs to support the use of
uv tool
instead ofpipx
, as it is sensibly faster and not many know about it.