Update build-amd64.yml

[shenxianpeng]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated the build job configuration to improve failure handling during execution.
  • Changed the macOS runner version to enhance compatibility.
  • Adjusted the path for patching CMake's implicit link libraries on macOS.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the build job in the .github/workflows/build-amd64.yml file. It adds the property fail-fast: false to the strategy section, altering the handling of failures in matrix jobs. The macOS runner is updated from macos-14 to macos-13, and the path in a sed command for patching CMake's libraries is changed from /opt/homebrew/Cellar to /usr/local/Cellar. The matrix configuration remains unchanged.

Changes

File	Change Summary
.github/workflows/build-amd64.yml	Added fail-fast: false to the strategy section of the build job; updated macOS runner from macos-14 to macos-13; changed sed command path from /opt/homebrew/Cellar to /usr/local/Cellar.

Possibly related PRs

• feat: support clang 19 #36: The changes in the .github/workflows/build-amd64.yml file in this PR also involve modifications to the build job's configuration, specifically related to the clang-version matrix, which is relevant to the changes made in the main PR regarding the build process.

Poem

In the land of code where rabbits play,
A change was made to brighten the day.
With fail-fast: false, we hop along,
Letting all jobs run, where they belong!
Clang and OS in a merry dance,
In the workflow's rhythm, we take a chance! 🐇✨

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between bb52e44 and d7560e7.

Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/build-amd64.yml (3 hunks)

Additional context used

actionlint

.github/workflows/build-amd64.yml

135-135: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2046:warning:1:52: Quote this to prevent word splitting

(shellcheck)

Additional comments not posted (2)

.github/workflows/build-amd64.yml (2)

21-21: LGTM: Addition of fail-fast: false to the strategy

This change allows all matrix jobs to run to completion, even if one or more jobs fail. It's beneficial for identifying all potential issues across different configurations in a single run. However, be aware that it may increase the overall execution time and resource usage of the workflow.

---

63-63: Please clarify the reason for downgrading the macOS runner

The macOS runner has been changed from macos-14 to macos-13. This downgrade might affect the build environment and potentially the resulting binaries. Could you please provide the rationale behind this change? Additionally, have you verified that this doesn't introduce any compatibility issues or unexpected behavior in the built artifacts?