Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: Remove redundant file outputs in transcription process #10

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 1, 2024

Conversation

johnnyhuy
Copy link
Collaborator

@johnnyhuy johnnyhuy commented Nov 1, 2024

PR Type

enhancement


Description

  • Removed redundant file outputs for speaker diarization, summary, sentiment analysis, and topic detection in the transcription process.
  • Streamlined the code by eliminating unnecessary file writing, which simplifies the transcription workflow.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
transcription.py
Remove redundant file outputs in transcription process     

transcribe_me/audio/transcription.py

  • Removed redundant file outputs for speaker diarization, summary,
    sentiment analysis, and topic detection.
  • Streamlined the transcription process by eliminating unnecessary file
    writing.
  • +0/-36   

    💡 PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    @github-actions github-actions bot added the feature Produce features label Nov 1, 2024
    @echohello-codium-ai-pr-agent echohello-codium-ai-pr-agent bot added enhancement and removed feature Produce features labels Nov 1, 2024
    @johnnyhuy johnnyhuy merged commit 73705a6 into main Nov 1, 2024
    4 checks passed
    @johnnyhuy johnnyhuy deleted the feature/remove branch November 1, 2024 22:54
    @github-actions github-actions bot added the feature Produce features label Nov 1, 2024
    @echohello-codium-ai-pr-agent
    Copy link

    PR Review 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]

    2, because the changes are straightforward and involve only the removal of code related to file outputs. The PR is small and the context of the changes is clear, making it relatively easy to review.

    🧪 Relevant tests

    No

    ⚡ Possible issues

    No

    🔒 Security concerns

    No

    @echohello-codium-ai-pr-agent
    Copy link

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Possible issue
    Add checks or fallbacks to handle dependencies on the removed file outputs

    Ensure that the removal of file outputs does not affect other parts of the system that
    might rely on these files. Consider adding checks or fallback mechanisms if necessary.

    transcribe_me/audio/transcription.py [102-104]

     def process_audio_files(
         input_folder: str, output_folder: str, config: Dict[str, Any]
     ) -> None:
    +    # Ensure no other system parts rely on the files previously generated
    +    # Implement necessary checks or fallbacks here
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: Ensuring that the removal of file outputs does not affect other parts of the system is important for system stability. This suggestion addresses a potential issue that could arise from the changes.

    8
    Enhancement
    Replace file outputs with a logging mechanism for better traceability and maintainability

    Consider implementing a logging mechanism instead of completely removing the output to
    files. This can help in maintaining the traceability and debugging capabilities without
    cluttering the file system.

    transcribe_me/audio/transcription.py [102-104]

    +import logging
    +
     def process_audio_files(
         input_folder: str, output_folder: str, config: Dict[str, Any]
     ) -> None:
    +    logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
    +    logger.info("Processing audio files")
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: Implementing a logging mechanism instead of file outputs can improve traceability and maintainability. However, it may not be crucial if the file outputs are not needed elsewhere in the system.

    7
    Add a configuration option to toggle file outputs instead of removing them entirely

    If the file outputs are being removed to clean up the output, consider adding a
    configuration option to toggle this feature instead of removing it completely. This allows
    users to enable it if needed.

    transcribe_me/audio/transcription.py [102-104]

     def process_audio_files(
         input_folder: str, output_folder: str, config: Dict[str, Any]
     ) -> None:
    +    if config.get('enable_file_output', False):
    +        # Original file output code here
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6

    Why: Providing a configuration option to toggle file outputs offers flexibility to users who might need this feature. However, it is not a critical enhancement if the feature is not widely used.

    6
    Maintainability
    Abstract the output handling into a separate class or module for better maintainability

    To ensure the system's adaptability and maintainability, consider abstracting the output
    functionality into a separate class or module. This way, changes to output handling can be
    made in a single place.

    transcribe_me/audio/transcription.py [102-104]

    +class OutputHandler:
    +    def __init__(self, config):
    +        self.config = config
    +
    +    def handle_output(self, data):
    +        if self.config.get('enable_file_output', False):
    +            # File output logic here
    +
     def process_audio_files(
         input_folder: str, output_folder: str, config: Dict[str, Any]
     ) -> None:
    +    output_handler = OutputHandler(config)
    +    # Use output_handler.handle_output(data) where needed
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: Abstracting output handling into a separate class or module can improve maintainability by centralizing changes. This is a good practice but not immediately necessary if the current implementation is simple.

    7

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    1 participant