[WIP] Updates to code #4
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
master HARK
compare results
|
I was wrong... the repo doesn't work on master branch yet |
|
some changes are required on HARK source code to make this run |
|
I believe Seb had pinned it to whatever version of HARK he was using when he updated it, so it should still work with that version, right? So I guess you're saying that it is incompatible with subsequent changes to HARK. |
|
yes, @sbenthall pinned this to version 0.11 This is part of the work to bring it up to date with development HARK |
|
The 'logging error' is actually due to invalidly specified I have not been able to test this further on this PR because of a local error |
|
@sbenthall, since @alanlujan91 will be otherwise occupied in the next few days, could you take charge of bringing the update of |
|
I can commit to continuing the work here to bring this repo up to HARK 0.13.0 That will be much easier after the 0.13.0 release, since then it will no longer be a moving target. It would be sensible to first merge a PR updating the dependency to 0.12.0. I'll start with that. It would be a good idea to make separate issues for the other improvements you have mentioned. The details can be worked out in those issues. |
|
See #5 for a discussion of population improvements. |
|
@wdu9 Could you please make an issue in the repository describing the performance improvements that you have in mind? |
|
this PR should now bring this project up to date with master branch |
|
can't seem to be able to tag you but can you review this as well @dedwar65? |
|
Decory,
I think you're better off not trying to study the old cstwMPC repo -- it
was written with a very old version of the toolkit and anything you learn
from it might be wrong (in the sense that it might not work with the
current version).
But it would be great if you were to review Alan's PR for the
DistributionOfWealthMPC repo, and propose improvements to the notebook(s).
…On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 8:31 AM Decory Edwards ***@***.***> wrote:
@alanlujan91 I’ve taken a look at it. I see that there are links to the
do_min.py and cstwMPC_main.py files. Should I take a look at those as well?
Also, if it is okay to do so, I can start making edits to this notebook as
well. Perhaps it would be good for me to work with the cstw notebook before
doing the analogy with rates of return. Should I wait until it is updated
to 13 to start on this?
Thanks and let me know,
Decory
From: alanlujan91 ***@***.***>
Date: Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 8:10 PM
To: econ-ark/DistributionOfWealthMPC ***@***.***>
Cc: Decory Edwards ***@***.***>, Mention ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [econ-ark/DistributionOfWealthMPC] [WIP] Updates to use
***@***.***` development branch (PR #4)
External Email - Use Caution
can't seem to be able to tag you but can you review this as well @dedwar65<
https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fdedwar65&data=05%7C01%7Cdedwar65%40jhu.edu%7Ce5901bdd5f7f4cd36e1e08dafa832738%7C9fa4f438b1e6473b803f86f8aedf0dec%7C0%7C0%7C638097738449584543%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=YyL5Iu7u4eEQ8NIsxVX36rswFWNgDtB%2FhFgULq0qkQI%3D&reserved=0
>?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<
https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fecon-ark%2FDistributionOfWealthMPC%2Fpull%2F4%23issuecomment-1397806911&data=05%7C01%7Cdedwar65%40jhu.edu%7Ce5901bdd5f7f4cd36e1e08dafa832738%7C9fa4f438b1e6473b803f86f8aedf0dec%7C0%7C0%7C638097738449584543%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=bKPL2SJdNAVlwWehtdXNAVMWEgS0hFOLvuVW65p9%2Bj8%3D&reserved=0>,
or unsubscribe<
https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnotifications%2Funsubscribe-auth%2FAR3YDSPCLVDLIOVD34BIWLDWTHQYFANCNFSM6AAAAAATO5LS7M&data=05%7C01%7Cdedwar65%40jhu.edu%7Ce5901bdd5f7f4cd36e1e08dafa832738%7C9fa4f438b1e6473b803f86f8aedf0dec%7C0%7C0%7C638097738449584543%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=4lRg8zppN8ZNmUtY3PzbYCYD93eLsNR2pWZkgFqNLlY%3D&reserved=0
>.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#4 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAKCK72TBYVLAQSKUKQ3MTLWTKHRHANCNFSM6AAAAAATO5LS7M>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
--
- Chris Carroll
|
|
Sounds good to me. The reason for my question is that, the “Micro Macro Implications of very impatient households” notebook seemed to do some of what is in the cstw paper in that it creates 7 types of households with different time preferences. But the code there doesn’t look like the cstwMPC notebook (for example, in the latter, cstw_main.py gets called in to solve the model but in the Micro/Macro notebook, the standard steps of defining the agent, solving, etc are invoked in the notebook directly).
I guess my question is what is the difference between these two notebooks? Are they doing the same thing but with one calling in code from somewhere else?
Decory
From: Christopher Llorracc Carroll ***@***.***>
Date: Friday, January 20, 2023 at 9:33 AM
To: econ-ark/DistributionOfWealthMPC ***@***.***>
Cc: Decory Edwards ***@***.***>, Mention ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [econ-ark/DistributionOfWealthMPC] [WIP] Updates to use ***@***.***` development branch (PR #4)
External Email - Use Caution
Decory,
I think you're better off not trying to study the old cstwMPC repo -- it
was written with a very old version of the toolkit and anything you learn
from it might be wrong (in the sense that it might not work with the
current version).
But it would be great if you were to review Alan's PR for the
DistributionOfWealthMPC repo, and propose improvements to the notebook(s).
…On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 8:31 AM Decory Edwards ***@***.***> wrote:
@alanlujan91 I’ve taken a look at it. I see that there are links to the
do_min.py and cstwMPC_main.py files. Should I take a look at those as well?
Also, if it is okay to do so, I can start making edits to this notebook as
well. Perhaps it would be good for me to work with the cstw notebook before
doing the analogy with rates of return. Should I wait until it is updated
to 13 to start on this?
Thanks and let me know,
Decory
From: alanlujan91 ***@***.***>
Date: Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 8:10 PM
To: econ-ark/DistributionOfWealthMPC ***@***.***>
Cc: Decory Edwards ***@***.***>, Mention ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [econ-ark/DistributionOfWealthMPC] [WIP] Updates to use
***@***.***` development branch (PR #4)
External Email - Use Caution
can't seem to be able to tag you but can you review this as well @dedwar65<
https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fdedwar65&data=05%7C01%7Cdedwar65%40jhu.edu%7Ce5901bdd5f7f4cd36e1e08dafa832738%7C9fa4f438b1e6473b803f86f8aedf0dec%7C0%7C0%7C638097738449584543%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=YyL5Iu7u4eEQ8NIsxVX36rswFWNgDtB%2FhFgULq0qkQI%3D&reserved=0
>?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<
https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fecon-ark%2FDistributionOfWealthMPC%2Fpull%2F4%23issuecomment-1397806911&data=05%7C01%7Cdedwar65%40jhu.edu%7Ce5901bdd5f7f4cd36e1e08dafa832738%7C9fa4f438b1e6473b803f86f8aedf0dec%7C0%7C0%7C638097738449584543%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=bKPL2SJdNAVlwWehtdXNAVMWEgS0hFOLvuVW65p9%2Bj8%3D&reserved=0>,
or unsubscribe<
https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnotifications%2Funsubscribe-auth%2FAR3YDSPCLVDLIOVD34BIWLDWTHQYFANCNFSM6AAAAAATO5LS7M&data=05%7C01%7Cdedwar65%40jhu.edu%7Ce5901bdd5f7f4cd36e1e08dafa832738%7C9fa4f438b1e6473b803f86f8aedf0dec%7C0%7C0%7C638097738449584543%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=4lRg8zppN8ZNmUtY3PzbYCYD93eLsNR2pWZkgFqNLlY%3D&reserved=0
>.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#4 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAKCK72TBYVLAQSKUKQ3MTLWTKHRHANCNFSM6AAAAAATO5LS7M>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
--
- Chris Carroll
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fecon-ark%2FDistributionOfWealthMPC%2Fpull%2F4%23issuecomment-1398474651&data=05%7C01%7Cdedwar65%40jhu.edu%7Ca053e89d9e244094b2d708dafaf34062%7C9fa4f438b1e6473b803f86f8aedf0dec%7C0%7C0%7C638098219918705730%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=sMI%2B2B%2BYN%2Fc%2Fop01gfkPcC0M089mVkOnRe6EDVjWgug%3D&reserved=0>, or unsubscribe<https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnotifications%2Funsubscribe-auth%2FAR3YDSNKMY23JPSEROBF5JLWTKOZ5ANCNFSM6AAAAAATO5LS7M&data=05%7C01%7Cdedwar65%40jhu.edu%7Ca053e89d9e244094b2d708dafaf34062%7C9fa4f438b1e6473b803f86f8aedf0dec%7C0%7C0%7C638098219918705730%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=QmDBEQtmh6PHYnPjVLrZc618kdhZIwDR0Bh9oUWomqk%3D&reserved=0>.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
|
@william ***@***.***> I have a quick question regarding the “Micro-Macro Implications of very impatient households” notebook you directed me to.
In that notebook, and the analogy of it regarding rates of return that I’ve been working on, both return the following error message:
“AttributeError: 'Uniform' object has no attribute 'approx' ”
This didn’t happen last week. Any thoughts? I’ve looked through the “Distribution.py” file but can’t seem to fix it myself.
Decory
From: Decory Edwards ***@***.***>
Date: Friday, January 20, 2023 at 10:08 AM
To: econ-ark/DistributionOfWealthMPC ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [econ-ark/DistributionOfWealthMPC] [WIP] Updates to use ***@***.***` development branch (PR #4)
Sounds good to me. The reason for my question is that, the “Micro Macro Implications of very impatient households” notebook seemed to do some of what is in the cstw paper in that it creates 7 types of households with different time preferences. But the code there doesn’t look like the cstwMPC notebook (for example, in the latter, cstw_main.py gets called in to solve the model but in the Micro/Macro notebook, the standard steps of defining the agent, solving, etc are invoked in the notebook directly).
I guess my question is what is the difference between these two notebooks? Are they doing the same thing but with one calling in code from somewhere else?
Decory
From: Christopher Llorracc Carroll ***@***.***>
Date: Friday, January 20, 2023 at 9:33 AM
To: econ-ark/DistributionOfWealthMPC ***@***.***>
Cc: Decory Edwards ***@***.***>, Mention ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [econ-ark/DistributionOfWealthMPC] [WIP] Updates to use ***@***.***` development branch (PR #4)
External Email - Use Caution
Decory,
I think you're better off not trying to study the old cstwMPC repo -- it
was written with a very old version of the toolkit and anything you learn
from it might be wrong (in the sense that it might not work with the
current version).
But it would be great if you were to review Alan's PR for the
DistributionOfWealthMPC repo, and propose improvements to the notebook(s).
…On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 8:31 AM Decory Edwards ***@***.***> wrote:
@alanlujan91 I’ve taken a look at it. I see that there are links to the
do_min.py and cstwMPC_main.py files. Should I take a look at those as well?
Also, if it is okay to do so, I can start making edits to this notebook as
well. Perhaps it would be good for me to work with the cstw notebook before
doing the analogy with rates of return. Should I wait until it is updated
to 13 to start on this?
Thanks and let me know,
Decory
From: alanlujan91 ***@***.***>
Date: Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 8:10 PM
To: econ-ark/DistributionOfWealthMPC ***@***.***>
Cc: Decory Edwards ***@***.***>, Mention ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [econ-ark/DistributionOfWealthMPC] [WIP] Updates to use
***@***.***` development branch (PR #4)
External Email - Use Caution
can't seem to be able to tag you but can you review this as well @dedwar65<
https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fdedwar65&data=05%7C01%7Cdedwar65%40jhu.edu%7Ce5901bdd5f7f4cd36e1e08dafa832738%7C9fa4f438b1e6473b803f86f8aedf0dec%7C0%7C0%7C638097738449584543%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=YyL5Iu7u4eEQ8NIsxVX36rswFWNgDtB%2FhFgULq0qkQI%3D&reserved=0
>?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<
https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fecon-ark%2FDistributionOfWealthMPC%2Fpull%2F4%23issuecomment-1397806911&data=05%7C01%7Cdedwar65%40jhu.edu%7Ce5901bdd5f7f4cd36e1e08dafa832738%7C9fa4f438b1e6473b803f86f8aedf0dec%7C0%7C0%7C638097738449584543%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=bKPL2SJdNAVlwWehtdXNAVMWEgS0hFOLvuVW65p9%2Bj8%3D&reserved=0>,
or unsubscribe<
https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnotifications%2Funsubscribe-auth%2FAR3YDSPCLVDLIOVD34BIWLDWTHQYFANCNFSM6AAAAAATO5LS7M&data=05%7C01%7Cdedwar65%40jhu.edu%7Ce5901bdd5f7f4cd36e1e08dafa832738%7C9fa4f438b1e6473b803f86f8aedf0dec%7C0%7C0%7C638097738449584543%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=4lRg8zppN8ZNmUtY3PzbYCYD93eLsNR2pWZkgFqNLlY%3D&reserved=0
>.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#4 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAKCK72TBYVLAQSKUKQ3MTLWTKHRHANCNFSM6AAAAAATO5LS7M>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
--
- Chris Carroll
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fecon-ark%2FDistributionOfWealthMPC%2Fpull%2F4%23issuecomment-1398474651&data=05%7C01%7Cdedwar65%40jhu.edu%7Ca053e89d9e244094b2d708dafaf34062%7C9fa4f438b1e6473b803f86f8aedf0dec%7C0%7C0%7C638098219918705730%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=sMI%2B2B%2BYN%2Fc%2Fop01gfkPcC0M089mVkOnRe6EDVjWgug%3D&reserved=0>, or unsubscribe<https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnotifications%2Funsubscribe-auth%2FAR3YDSNKMY23JPSEROBF5JLWTKOZ5ANCNFSM6AAAAAATO5LS7M&data=05%7C01%7Cdedwar65%40jhu.edu%7Ca053e89d9e244094b2d708dafaf34062%7C9fa4f438b1e6473b803f86f8aedf0dec%7C0%7C0%7C638098219918705730%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=QmDBEQtmh6PHYnPjVLrZc618kdhZIwDR0Bh9oUWomqk%3D&reserved=0>.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
|
@dedwar65 this is an error because the project you are working on should not be on the master branch, but instead should probably be pinned to econ-ark = 0.12. |
|
Decory,
That's because of a merge that Alan made a few days ago.
Alan,
My guess is that the solution to this is just to go ahead and merge your PR
for the DemARKs, right?
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 11:27 AM Decory Edwards ***@***.***>
wrote:
… @william ***@***.***> I have a quick question regarding the “Micro-Macro
Implications of very impatient households” notebook you directed me to.
In that notebook, and the analogy of it regarding rates of return that
I’ve been working on, both return the following error message:
“AttributeError: 'Uniform' object has no attribute 'approx' ”
This didn’t happen last week. Any thoughts? I’ve looked through the
“Distribution.py” file but can’t seem to fix it myself.
Decory
From: Decory Edwards ***@***.***>
Date: Friday, January 20, 2023 at 10:08 AM
To: econ-ark/DistributionOfWealthMPC ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [econ-ark/DistributionOfWealthMPC] [WIP] Updates to use
***@***.***` development branch (PR #4)
Sounds good to me. The reason for my question is that, the “Micro Macro
Implications of very impatient households” notebook seemed to do some of
what is in the cstw paper in that it creates 7 types of households with
different time preferences. But the code there doesn’t look like the
cstwMPC notebook (for example, in the latter, cstw_main.py gets called in
to solve the model but in the Micro/Macro notebook, the standard steps of
defining the agent, solving, etc are invoked in the notebook directly).
I guess my question is what is the difference between these two notebooks?
Are they doing the same thing but with one calling in code from somewhere
else?
Decory
From: Christopher Llorracc Carroll ***@***.***>
Date: Friday, January 20, 2023 at 9:33 AM
To: econ-ark/DistributionOfWealthMPC ***@***.***>
Cc: Decory Edwards ***@***.***>, Mention ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [econ-ark/DistributionOfWealthMPC] [WIP] Updates to use
***@***.***` development branch (PR #4)
External Email - Use Caution
Decory,
I think you're better off not trying to study the old cstwMPC repo -- it
was written with a very old version of the toolkit and anything you learn
from it might be wrong (in the sense that it might not work with the
current version).
But it would be great if you were to review Alan's PR for the
DistributionOfWealthMPC repo, and propose improvements to the notebook(s).
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 8:31 AM Decory Edwards ***@***.***>
wrote:
> @alanlujan91 I’ve taken a look at it. I see that there are links to the
> do_min.py and cstwMPC_main.py files. Should I take a look at those as
well?
>
> Also, if it is okay to do so, I can start making edits to this notebook
as
> well. Perhaps it would be good for me to work with the cstw notebook
before
> doing the analogy with rates of return. Should I wait until it is updated
> to 13 to start on this?
>
> Thanks and let me know,
> Decory
>
> From: alanlujan91 ***@***.***>
> Date: Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 8:10 PM
> To: econ-ark/DistributionOfWealthMPC ***@***.***>
> Cc: Decory Edwards ***@***.***>, Mention ***@***.***>
> Subject: Re: [econ-ark/DistributionOfWealthMPC] [WIP] Updates to use
> ***@***.***` development branch (PR #4)
>
> External Email - Use Caution
>
>
>
>
>
> can't seem to be able to tag you but can you review this as well
@dedwar65<
>
https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fdedwar65&data=05%7C01%7Cdedwar65%40jhu.edu%7Ce5901bdd5f7f4cd36e1e08dafa832738%7C9fa4f438b1e6473b803f86f8aedf0dec%7C0%7C0%7C638097738449584543%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=YyL5Iu7u4eEQ8NIsxVX36rswFWNgDtB%2FhFgULq0qkQI%3D&reserved=0
> >?
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<
>
https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fecon-ark%2FDistributionOfWealthMPC%2Fpull%2F4%23issuecomment-1397806911&data=05%7C01%7Cdedwar65%40jhu.edu%7Ce5901bdd5f7f4cd36e1e08dafa832738%7C9fa4f438b1e6473b803f86f8aedf0dec%7C0%7C0%7C638097738449584543%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=bKPL2SJdNAVlwWehtdXNAVMWEgS0hFOLvuVW65p9%2Bj8%3D&reserved=0
>,
> or unsubscribe<
>
https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnotifications%2Funsubscribe-auth%2FAR3YDSPCLVDLIOVD34BIWLDWTHQYFANCNFSM6AAAAAATO5LS7M&data=05%7C01%7Cdedwar65%40jhu.edu%7Ce5901bdd5f7f4cd36e1e08dafa832738%7C9fa4f438b1e6473b803f86f8aedf0dec%7C0%7C0%7C638097738449584543%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=4lRg8zppN8ZNmUtY3PzbYCYD93eLsNR2pWZkgFqNLlY%3D&reserved=0
> >.
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <
#4 (comment)
>,
> or unsubscribe
> <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAKCK72TBYVLAQSKUKQ3MTLWTKHRHANCNFSM6AAAAAATO5LS7M
>
> .
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
> ***@***.***>
>
--
- Chris Carroll
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<
https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fecon-ark%2FDistributionOfWealthMPC%2Fpull%2F4%23issuecomment-1398474651&data=05%7C01%7Cdedwar65%40jhu.edu%7Ca053e89d9e244094b2d708dafaf34062%7C9fa4f438b1e6473b803f86f8aedf0dec%7C0%7C0%7C638098219918705730%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=sMI%2B2B%2BYN%2Fc%2Fop01gfkPcC0M089mVkOnRe6EDVjWgug%3D&reserved=0>,
or unsubscribe<
https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnotifications%2Funsubscribe-auth%2FAR3YDSNKMY23JPSEROBF5JLWTKOZ5ANCNFSM6AAAAAATO5LS7M&data=05%7C01%7Cdedwar65%40jhu.edu%7Ca053e89d9e244094b2d708dafaf34062%7C9fa4f438b1e6473b803f86f8aedf0dec%7C0%7C0%7C638098219918705730%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=QmDBEQtmh6PHYnPjVLrZc618kdhZIwDR0Bh9oUWomqk%3D&reserved=0
>.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#4 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAKCK7YYDP4RUCA3D7A5QCTWT2WOTANCNFSM6AAAAAATO5LS7M>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
--
- Chris Carroll
|
This reverts commit a4b64cc.
takes too long to run...
alanlujan91
changed the title
econ-ark/HARK@master development branch
|
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
seems to be working, still waiting for results to finish
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.