-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 58
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Skip EnsureRenderedStringPattern
preprocessor if parameter has verbatim directives
#19
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -32,6 +32,21 @@ def test_ensure_rendered_string_pattern(mocker): | |
) == "my-cluster-{{unknown_var.task_id}}" | ||
warning_mock.assert_called_once() | ||
|
||
|
||
warning_mock = Mock() | ||
mocker.patch.object(logger, 'warning', new=warning_mock) | ||
assert renderer.process_arg( | ||
"my-<<item_name>>-cluster", None, {}, | ||
) == "my-<<item_name>>-cluster" | ||
warning_mock.assert_called_once() | ||
|
||
warning_mock = Mock() | ||
mocker.patch.object(logger, 'warning', new=warning_mock) | ||
assert renderer.process_arg( | ||
"my-cluster-<<item.value>>", None, {}, | ||
) == "my-cluster-<<item.value>>" | ||
warning_mock.assert_called_once() | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Nice tests, thanks! |
||
|
||
with pytest.raises(Exception): | ||
renderer.process_arg("my-cluster-", None, {}) | ||
|
||
|
@@ -46,3 +61,6 @@ def test_ensure_rendered_string_pattern(mocker): | |
"my-cluster-{{execution_date.strftime('%Y_%m_%d')}}", | ||
None, | ||
{}) | ||
|
||
with pytest.raises(Exception): | ||
renderer.process_arg("My-<<non-item.value>>-cluster", None, {}) |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey so one feature that I would like to support is the ability to actually require that the argument be a (or contain a) verbatim string... For example, there are some operators that take methods as arguments, and the only way we can support those right now is for the parameter passed to the operator to be a lambda (at the moment we do not enforce any restrictions on these, but we probably should).
So could we do the
VERBATIM_REGEX
check only if theregex.match()
check fails? Maybe change the code to something like (starting at line 114 and replacing all of the rest of the method):There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh and also, I think we can loosen the definition of the
VERBATIM_STRING
regex to something like<<.+>>
, because generally speaking it's possible for any verbatim string to be present, and we can't check any of them.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the comments. Done!