Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

adding featureId to ldap schema #90

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

RemiDesgrange
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@@ -50,3 +50,11 @@ A LDAP attribute, representing a date of agreement on privacy policy.

- partial OID: `1.2.1`
- complete OID: `1.3.6.1.4.1.53611.1.2.1`

### 1.2.2
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

missing attribute name featureId


### 1.2.2

A LDAP attribute, representing any kind of custom attribute. For exemple post codes, internal ids
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's not "any kind of custom attribute".
It's a numeric, more specifically a positive integer meant to identify a polygonal area.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah... So my definition of it in ldap is wrong. I choose a string repr: 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15

In the other hand, Bastia (corsica) have an inseeCode named 2B033.

Another example (still in France): Bourg-en-bresse 01053

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point.
Let's go for a string.

@fvanderbiest
Copy link
Member

@RemiDesgrange can you refresh my memory - why was this contributed originally ?
What's the status of this PR ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants