Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes gpg.format default value #1926

Conversation

ruyadorno
Copy link

Changes

Update the gpg.format value reference to opengpg instead of gpg.

Context

The gitformat-signature docs page refers to a gpg value that does not work as expected. Using the value opengpg instead, as documented under https://git-scm.com/docs/git-config gpg.format section fixes it.

The `gitformat-signature` docs page refers to a `gpg` value that
does not work as expected. Using the value `opengpg` instead, as
documented under https://git-scm.com/docs/git-config `gpg.format`
section fixes it.
<dt class="hdlist1" id="Documentation/gitformat-signature.txt-codegpgcodePGP"> <a class="anchor" href="#Documentation/gitformat-signature.txt-codegpgcodePGP"></a><code>gpg</code> (PGP) </dt>
<dt class="hdlist1" id="Documentation/gitformat-signature.txt-codegpgcodePGP"> <a class="anchor" href="#Documentation/gitformat-signature.txt-codegpgcodePGP"></a><code>opengpg</code> (PGP) </dt>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please note the notice at the top of that file:

### DO NOT EDIT! Generated by script/update-docs.rb

The original source of this is actually here: https://github.com/git/git/blob/v2.47.1/Documentation/gitformat-signature.txt#L28.

Please follow the guidelines at https://git-scm.com/community's Contributing to Git to propose the patch on the Git mailing list instead.

@dscho dscho closed this Dec 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants