Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add analysis_is_diff_informed to status report #2698

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 16, 2025

Conversation

cklin
Copy link
Contributor

@cklin cklin commented Jan 16, 2025

This PR adds the analysis_is_diff_informed field to the analysis status report.

Merge / deployment checklist

  • Confirm this change is backwards compatible with existing workflows.
  • Confirm the readme has been updated if necessary.
  • Confirm the changelog has been updated if necessary.

@cklin cklin marked this pull request as ready for review January 16, 2025 17:14
@Copilot Copilot bot review requested due to automatic review settings January 16, 2025 17:14
@cklin cklin requested a review from a team as a code owner January 16, 2025 17:14
@cklin cklin requested a review from angelapwen January 16, 2025 17:14

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 6 out of 6 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Tip: If you use Visual Studio Code, you can request a review from Copilot before you push from the "Source Control" tab. Learn more

Copy link
Contributor

@angelapwen angelapwen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good 🥳

@cklin cklin merged commit 94f08f3 into main Jan 16, 2025
527 checks passed
@cklin cklin deleted the cklin/diff-informed-status-report branch January 16, 2025 20:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants