Add GitHub actions

[AlyxPractice]

While playing with Bufallo, I noticed Github Actions was not supported out-of-the box. This PR aims to solve this by adding a standard GHA template.

I've sorted the ci-provider alphabetically, along the tests, so it's easier to spot what we are looking for.

I haven't had the chance yet to test the template itself.

I'm fairly new to Golang so I might have missed a few things, let me know.

---

Note
There were some issues with tests that I don't think my changes are touching, I'm not sure what's happening.

[sio4]

Thanks for adding Github Action!
Also, sorting them on the option is nice. (just one of my habits, I usually make a separate commit for easy reading for changed things on another commit but yours also fine :-)

I added some comments about unnecessary changes in the test code and an outdated command. Please fix them and I will proceed the next step.

[AlyxPractice]

Thanks a lot for your quick review! Let me know if I can do something else.

[sio4]

@VictorBersy please do not push an empty commit.

[AlyxPractice]

@VictorBersy please do not push an empty commit.

Sorry I don't think I can restart failing jobs :(

Won't it be squashed anyway at the merge?

[sio4]

Yeah, will do. anyway, if I found a failed test, I still have a chance to check if the failure is ignorable or just run the failed one manually without spending the whole test hours. also, I need to check/review what is on the (empty) commit. :-)

[AlyxPractice]

Oh right I see 🙇 It's my first real OSS contributions so I'm still figuring out things 🫣

[sio4]

NOTE: failed test is not an issue with the PR but the timeout. (need to check if we can reduce the testing time)

• panic: test timed out after 10m0s
• cli/internal/cmd/fix_test.TestFix_v0_16_27.func2

[sio4]

I roughly don't think this PR introduced the test failure but I would like to check the fix manually.

Please wait until the test is completed.

[sio4]

I tested the failed test case (actually along with all others) in my local environment (ubuntu 20.04 + go1.17.8) and the result was fine. I will merge it into the development branch now and will check if the test fails again.

Interestingly, the other PRs (dependabot's PRs) just succeeded on the same tests always 🤔

[AlyxPractice]

Interesting, I will try to see if I can help with #200 then.

Glad I could contribute, thanks a lot for your patience and review 🙇

[sio4]

Thank you for your contribution and your patience during waiting for a long review. I wanted to make it sure the change is totally compatible with the code base and also it could be a chance to find/fix another (unrelated) bug on the code or testing.

Interesting, I will try to see if I can help with #200 then.

I think there should be some strategic decision inside the team, and since there is another progress updating plugin architecture which is a big thing and not fully compatible with the current code base, I think the issue would be addressed once we have a new codebase and having discussion.