Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve dynamic attribute internal validation handling #1090

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Feb 13, 2025

Conversation

SBGoods
Copy link
Contributor

@SBGoods SBGoods commented Feb 11, 2025

Follow up PR to #1044

Mainly adds logic to handle underlying null values for dynamic attributes in the internal attribute validation. It also addresses minor comments in the write-only attribute PR.

Copy link
Member

@austinvalle austinvalle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left some thoughts on the dynamic attribute validation, everything else looks good!

Also thank you for leaving a bread crumb in the comments, that was very helpful 🙏🏻

internal/fwserver/attribute_validation.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/fwserver/attribute_validation.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@austinvalle austinvalle added this to the v1.14.0 milestone Feb 12, 2025
@SBGoods SBGoods changed the title [Draft] Improve dynamic attribute internal validation handling Improve dynamic attribute internal validation handling Feb 13, 2025
@SBGoods SBGoods marked this pull request as ready for review February 13, 2025 17:45
@SBGoods SBGoods requested review from a team as code owners February 13, 2025 17:45
Copy link
Member

@austinvalle austinvalle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great work! 🚀

@SBGoods SBGoods merged commit 0724df1 into main Feb 13, 2025
35 checks passed
@SBGoods SBGoods deleted the SBGoods/write-only-dynamic-validation branch February 13, 2025 23:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants