Add Appwrite #36619
Add Appwrite #36619
Conversation
home-assistant
bot
added
has-parent
✅ Deploy Preview for home-assistant-docs ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new integration for Appwrite, allowing users to execute functions in both self-hosted and cloud instances. It includes detailed documentation on configuration requirements such as the Appwrite instance URL, project ID, and API key. The integration enables triggering functions using the action format Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant HomeAssistant
participant AppwriteInstance
User->>HomeAssistant: Trigger Appwrite Function
HomeAssistant->>AppwriteInstance: Execute Function
AppwriteInstance-->>HomeAssistant: Function Execution Result
HomeAssistant-->>User: Return Result
The sequence diagram illustrates the high-level interaction between the user, Home Assistant, and the Appwrite instance when executing a function through the new integration. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
source/_integrations/appwrite.markdown (3)
17-17: Clarify action naming pattern and project ID uniquenessThe current description of the action pattern could be clearer. Consider revising to:
-The integration provides `appwrite.execute_function_{id}` action which can be used to trigger a function. Multiple instances of Appwrite are supported as long as the project id is unique. +The integration provides an action in the format `appwrite.execute_function_<instance_id>` which can be used to trigger functions. Multiple Appwrite instances are supported, but each must have a unique project ID in your Home Assistant configuration.
22-34: Enhance configuration field descriptionsThe configuration fields would benefit from more detailed descriptions:
URL field should specify the expected format and protocol (e.g., "The full URL of your Appwrite instance including protocol, e.g., https://appwrite.yourdomain.com").
API key description should explain why each scope is needed:
execution.write: Required for executing functionshealth.read: Required for validating the connection
36-38: Add context to reference linksConsider adding brief descriptions of what users will find in these references:
-[Appwrite Project ID Reference](https://appwrite.io/docs/references#api) - -[Appwrite API Key Reference](https://appwrite.io/docs/advanced/platform/api-keys) +For more information: +- [How to find your Project ID in Appwrite](https://appwrite.io/docs/references#api) +- [How to create and manage API keys with required scopes](https://appwrite.io/docs/advanced/platform/api-keys)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
source/_integrations/appwrite.markdown(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
source/_integrations/appwrite.markdown (1)
55-59: LGTM!
The removal instructions are clear and correctly include the standard removal service template.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
source/_integrations/appwrite.markdown (2)
15-18: Enhance introduction with prerequisites and documentation linksConsider adding:
- Prerequisites section mentioning minimum Appwrite version requirements
- Link to Appwrite's main documentation for those unfamiliar with the platform
- Brief mention of what Appwrite functions are and their common use cases
36-40: Expand documentation resourcesConsider adding links to:
- Appwrite function creation and management documentation
- Troubleshooting guide for common issues
- Best practices for function development
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
source/_integrations/appwrite.markdown(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
source/_integrations/appwrite.markdown (2)
4-5: Consider revising the integration category
The "Network" category might not be the most appropriate for a function execution service. Consider using "Integration" or "Automation" instead, as this better reflects the integration's purpose.
64-68: LGTM!
The removal instructions are clear and correctly use the standard template.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
source/_integrations/appwrite.markdown (1)
41-62: Enhance example clarity and completenessConsider the following improvements to the examples:
- Add common headers to the
function_headersexample:function_headers: Content-Type: "application/json" # Common for JSON payloads X-Custom-Header: "value"
- Show both path and query parameter examples:
function_path: "/process/image?format=jpg" # Path + query parameters
- Add a comment explaining that the instance ID (1234560, 0987654) comes from the integration configuration.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
source/_integrations/appwrite.markdown(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
source/_integrations/appwrite.markdown (4)
4-5: Consider revising the integration category
The "Network" category might not be the most appropriate for a function execution service. Consider using "Integration" or "Automation" instead, as this better reflects the integration's purpose.
15-17: LGTM! Clear and informative introduction
The introduction effectively explains the integration's purpose and capabilities, including support for both self-hosted and cloud instances.
21-34: Enhance configuration validation and security guidance
Please enhance the configuration section with:
- URL format guidance (e.g.,
https://cloud.appwrite.io/v1orhttp://localhost/v1) - Security considerations for API key storage
- Explanation of why the
health.readscope is required
64-68: LGTM! Clear removal instructions
The removal section correctly follows Home Assistant's standard documentation pattern.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
source/_integrations/appwrite.markdown (2)
17-17: Clarify instance identification in action formatThe action format explanation could be clearer with an example showing how
instance_idrelates to the configuration. Consider adding:
"For example, if you have configured two Appwrite instances, one with project ID '1234' and another with '5678', the action names would beappwrite.1234_function_nameandappwrite.5678_function_namerespectively."
36-40: Add self-hosted instance setup informationFor completeness, consider adding:
- Link to self-hosted Appwrite installation guide
- Any specific configuration requirements for self-hosted instances
- Network requirements and security considerations for self-hosted setups
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
source/_integrations/appwrite.markdown(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
source/_integrations/appwrite.markdown
[style] ~66-~66: In this context, the modal ‘will’ typically forms a contraction with ‘not’ (won’t), as opposed to the preceding noun/pronoun (it’ll).
Context: ...ration doesn't actively poll, as such it'll not know on its own if new function is avai...
(YOU_LL_NOT)
[uncategorized] ~66-~66: You might be missing the article “a” here.
Context: ...l, as such it'll not know on its own if new function is available. However, reloadi...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_A)
[uncategorized] ~66-~66: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...ould automatically generate service for new function. ## Remove integration This ...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
source/_integrations/appwrite.markdown (3)
4-7: Revise integration category and IoT class
The "Network" category might not be the most appropriate for a function execution service. Consider using "Integration" or "Automation" instead, as this better reflects the integration's purpose.
The IoT class "Cloud Push" seems incorrect. Since this integration provides an action to execute functions on-demand and doesn't poll for data, consider using "Local Push" for self-hosted instances or "Cloud Push" for cloud instances.
21-34: Add configuration validation and security guidancePlease enhance the configuration section with:
- URL format guidance (e.g.,
https://cloud.appwrite.io/v1orhttp://localhost/v1)- Security considerations for API key storage
- Explanation of why the
health.readscope is required
43-62: Fix inconsistencies in example payloads
The default HTTP method is inconsistent:
- Line 48 states default is "GET"
- Line 61 states default is "GET"
- But the basic example shows "POST"
The
function_pathexample might be confusing:
- Line 56 shows
"?format=jpg"which suggests query parameters- Consider showing both path and query parameter examples
Add validation information for each field:
- Valid values for
function_method- Format requirements for
function_scheduled_at- Size limits for
function_body
|
|
||
| ## Identifying New Functions | ||
|
|
||
| Since the integration doesn't actively poll, as such it'll not know on its own if new function is available. However, reloading the integration should automatically generate service for new function. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve grammar and clarity in the new functions section
The sentence has several grammatical issues. Consider revising to:
-Since the integration doesn't actively poll, as such it'll not know on its own if new function is available. However, reloading the integration should automatically generate service for new function.
+Since the integration doesn't actively poll, it won't automatically detect when a new function becomes available. However, reloading the integration will automatically generate a service for the new function.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| Since the integration doesn't actively poll, as such it'll not know on its own if new function is available. However, reloading the integration should automatically generate service for new function. | |
| Since the integration doesn't actively poll, it won't automatically detect when a new function becomes available. However, reloading the integration will automatically generate a service for the new function. |
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~66-~66: In this context, the modal ‘will’ typically forms a contraction with ‘not’ (won’t), as opposed to the preceding noun/pronoun (it’ll).
Context: ...ration doesn't actively poll, as such it'll not know on its own if new function is avai...
(YOU_LL_NOT)
[uncategorized] ~66-~66: You might be missing the article “a” here.
Context: ...l, as such it'll not know on its own if new function is available. However, reloadi...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_A)
[uncategorized] ~66-~66: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...ould automatically generate service for new function. ## Remove integration This ...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
Proposed change
Add Appwrite
Type of change
currentbranch).currentbranch).nextbranch).nextbranch).Additional information
Checklist
currentbranch.nextbranch.Summary by CodeRabbit