Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extend backup upload API with file name parameter #5568

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

agners
Copy link
Member

@agners agners commented Jan 22, 2025

Proposed change

Add a query parameter which allows to specify the file name on upload. All locations will store the backup with the same file name.

Type of change

  • Dependency upgrade
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (which adds functionality to the supervisor)
  • Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
  • Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Additional information

  • This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #
  • This PR is related to issue:
  • Link to documentation pull request:
  • Link to cli pull request:
  • Link to client library pull request:

Checklist

  • The code change is tested and works locally.
  • Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
  • There is no commented out code in this PR.
  • I have followed the development checklist
  • The code has been formatted using Ruff (ruff format supervisor tests)
  • Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If API endpoints or add-on configuration are added/changed:

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Enhanced backup upload functionality to allow specifying custom filenames.
    • Improved backup file naming and organization options.
  • Tests

    • Added test coverage for filename-specific backup upload scenarios.

These updates provide users with greater flexibility when uploading backups, enabling the definition of custom filenames during the backup process.

Add a query parameter which allows to specify the file name on upload.
All locations will store the backup with the same file name.
@agners agners added the new-feature A new feature label Jan 22, 2025
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 22, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces an enhancement to the backup upload functionality across multiple files in the supervisor system. The changes allow specifying a custom filename when uploading a backup file. This modification spans the API layer, backup manager, and includes a corresponding test case to validate the new feature. The implementation provides more flexibility in handling backup file names while maintaining the existing core backup processes.

Changes

File Change Summary
supervisor/api/backups.py Added support for ATTR_FILENAME in upload method, allowing filename specification during backup upload.
supervisor/backups/manager.py Updated import_backup method signature to include optional filename parameter, modifying tar file path logic.
tests/api/test_backups.py Added new test test_upload_with_filename to verify backup upload with custom filename.

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant BackupAPI
    participant BackupManager
    participant FileSystem

    Client->>BackupAPI: Upload backup with filename
    BackupAPI->>BackupManager: import_backup(tar_file, filename)
    BackupManager->>FileSystem: Determine tar file path
    alt Filename provided
        BackupManager->>FileSystem: Use custom filename
    else No filename
        BackupManager->>FileSystem: Use default slug
    end
    BackupManager->>FileSystem: Rename and store backup
    BackupManager-->>BackupAPI: Backup imported
    BackupAPI-->>Client: Upload successful
Loading
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 805017e and 2722f4d.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • supervisor/api/backups.py (3 hunks)
  • supervisor/backups/manager.py (3 hunks)
  • tests/api/test_backups.py (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: Run tests Python 3.13.1
  • GitHub Check: Build armv7 supervisor
  • GitHub Check: Build armhf supervisor
  • GitHub Check: Build aarch64 supervisor
🔇 Additional comments (4)
tests/api/test_backups.py (1)

719-740: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage for the new filename parameter.

The test thoroughly verifies:

  1. Successful upload with custom filename
  2. Correct storage of the backup file
  3. Proper mapping in backup locations
  4. Consistent backup slug
supervisor/api/backups.py (1)

29-29: LGTM!

The import of ATTR_FILENAME constant is correctly placed and used in the upload method.

supervisor/backups/manager.py (2)

354-354: LGTM!

The filename parameter is correctly typed and follows Python's parameter ordering conventions.


366-370: LGTM!

The implementation:

  1. Safely extracts the filename using Path.name
  2. Maintains backward compatibility
  3. Preserves existing error handling

Also applies to: 372-372, 381-381

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
supervisor/api/backups.py (1)

488-491: ⚠️ Potential issue

Add validation for the filename parameter.

The filename from the query parameter should be validated to prevent security issues such as path traversal attacks and ensure it's a valid backup filename.

The existing RE_BACKUP_FILENAME pattern should be used to validate the filename before using it.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2722f4d and 19638e7.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • supervisor/api/backups.py (3 hunks)
  • tests/api/test_backups.py (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • tests/api/test_backups.py
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: Run tests Python 3.13.1
  • GitHub Check: Build armv7 supervisor
  • GitHub Check: Build armhf supervisor
  • GitHub Check: Build aarch64 supervisor
🔇 Additional comments (2)
supervisor/api/backups.py (2)

29-29: LGTM!

The constant import is correctly placed and follows the project's naming conventions.


518-521: LGTM!

The import_backup call is correctly modified to include the filename parameter while maintaining code style consistency and proper async operation protection.

Comment on lines +488 to +491
filename: str | None = None
if ATTR_FILENAME in request.query:
filename = request.query.get(ATTR_FILENAME)

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Documentation update needed for the filename parameter

The codebase review confirms that the new filename parameter is not documented. The API endpoints are documented through docstrings, but the new parameter is missing from:

  • The endpoint's docstring
  • Any general API documentation

This makes it harder for users to discover and properly use this new feature.

🔗 Analysis chain

Consider updating the API documentation.

This new feature introduces a query parameter that should be documented to help users understand:

  1. The purpose and usage of the filename parameter
  2. The filename format requirements
  3. Any security considerations

Let's check if there's existing API documentation that needs to be updated:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for API documentation files
fd -e md -e rst . | grep -i "api\|doc\|backup"

Length of output: 48


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for documentation and API schema files using multiple approaches
echo "=== Searching for documentation files ==="
find . -type f -name "*.md" -o -name "*.rst" -o -name "*.txt" | grep -i "doc\|api\|backup"

echo -e "\n=== Searching for API schema files ==="
find . -type f -name "*.json" -o -name "*.yaml" -o -name "*.yml" | grep -i "api\|schema"

echo -e "\n=== Searching file contents for API documentation ==="
rg -l "API" --type md --type rst

Length of output: 35678


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check README content and search for backup API documentation
echo "=== README.md content ==="
cat README.md | grep -A 5 -i "api\|backup"

echo -e "\n=== Searching for backup API documentation in Python files ==="
rg -l "backup.*api" --type py

echo -e "\n=== Checking for API docstrings in backup endpoints ==="
rg -A 5 '"""' supervisor/api/backups.py

Length of output: 5865

@@ -484,6 +485,10 @@ async def upload(self, request: web.Request):
if location and location != LOCATION_CLOUD_BACKUP:
tmp_path = location.local_where

filename: str | None = None
if ATTR_FILENAME in request.query:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We need to validate this using the same RE_BACKUP_FILENAME regex we used here:

vol.Optional(ATTR_FILENAME): vol.Match(RE_BACKUP_FILENAME),

@home-assistant
Copy link

Please take a look at the requested changes, and use the Ready for review button when you are done, thanks 👍

Learn more about our pull request process.

@home-assistant home-assistant bot marked this pull request as draft January 23, 2025 22:12
@mdegat01 mdegat01 added missing-documentation Added to pull requests that needs a docs, but none is linked need-client-library Added to pull requests that need client library changes but none is linked labels Jan 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla-signed missing-documentation Added to pull requests that needs a docs, but none is linked need-client-library Added to pull requests that need client library changes but none is linked new-feature A new feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants