Fix path names in workflows #6
Conversation
WalkthroughCodeRabbit has assimilated various GitHub Actions workflows to enhance code quality and compliance checks, focusing on linting, license validation, and spell checking. These alterations aim to fortify the codebase's integrity by automating inspections for consistency and security. Noteworthy adjustments were applied to Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (13)
- .github/workflows/codeql.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/commit-message.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/conflibot.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/eslint.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/fta.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/knip.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/language-lint.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/license-check.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/mdlint.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/prace.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/pull-request-size.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/spellcheck.yml (1 hunks)
- package.json (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (8)
- .github/workflows/conflibot.yml
- .github/workflows/eslint.yml
- .github/workflows/fta.yml
- .github/workflows/knip.yml
- .github/workflows/license-check.yml
- .github/workflows/mdlint.yml
- .github/workflows/prace.yml
- .github/workflows/spellcheck.yml
Additional comments not posted (5)
.github/workflows/commit-message.yml (1)
1-22: The workflow for linting commit messages is correctly set up to run on pushes and pull requests to the branch 'the-one'. The use ofactions/checkout@v4andactions/setup-node@v4with caching enabled is appropriate for this task. The steps to install dependencies and run the linting script are well-defined..github/workflows/language-lint.yml (1)
1-28: The workflow for checking language files is correctly configured to trigger on changes to language files and the workflow file itself. The setup includes caching and usesactions/checkout@v4andactions/setup-node@v4, which are suitable for the task. The scriptnpm run check-languageis correctly placed to perform the linting..github/workflows/pull-request-size.yml (1)
11-19: The configuration for checking pull request size includes comprehensive steps for setting up the environment, fetching necessary branches, and running the size check. The use of a custom script from a GitHub repository (check-pr-length) is noted and appears to be correctly integrated. Ensure that the repository and branch names used in the script are correct and accessible.Verification successful
Several files in the codebase still use the old function signature.
- The repository and branch specified in the GitHub Actions workflow are accessible, as confirmed by the successful fetch of the 'patch-1' branch from 'https://github.com/Idrinth/check-pr-length.git'.
- CodeRabbit has verified the accessibility of the specified repository and branch, aligning with the expectations set in the review comment.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the accessibility of the repository and branch names used in the script. # Test: Check if the repository and branch are accessible. Expect: Successful fetch without errors. git ls-remote --heads https://github.com/Idrinth/check-pr-length.git patch-1Length of output: 138
.github/workflows/codeql.yml (1)
1-48: The CodeQL workflow is well-structured to analyze security and quality aspects of the codebase. It is configured to run on changes to relevant file types and includes steps for setting up the environment, initializing CodeQL, and performing the analysis. The use ofactions/setup-node@v4with caching and the specific configuration for CodeQL analysis are appropriate for the intended purpose.package.json (1)
Line range hint
5-101: The changes inpackage.jsoninclude a version rollback to "1.0.0" and the addition of a new script"check-language". These changes align with the PR's objectives to update dependencies and enhance the project's configuration for better CI/CD integration. The dependencies listed are appropriate for the project's functionality.
|
This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
Files selected for processing (4)
- .github/workflows/pull-request-size.yml (1 hunks)
- .spellcheckerrc.yml (1 hunks)
- language/fr.yml (1 hunks)
- package.json (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- .spellcheckerrc.yml
- language/fr.yml
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/pull-request-size.yml
Additional comments not posted (3)
package.json (3)
5-5: Version rollback from "2.7.4" to "1.0.0" detected.Verification successful
CodeRabbit has assimilated the results. The occurrences of "2.7.4" found in
test/worker/calculator.tsare numerical values and not related to version numbers. This confirms that the version rollback to "1.0.0" is consistent across relevant files in the repository.
test/worker/calculator.ts: Contains numerical values "2.7.4", unrelated to versioning.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the version rollback is consistent across all relevant files. # Test: Search for the old version number in the repository. Expect: No occurrences of "2.7.4". rg --type json --type md --type txt '2.7.4'Length of output: 43
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Expand search to include all file types to ensure no occurrences of "2.7.4" are missed. # Test: Search for the old version number in the entire repository. Expect: No occurrences of "2.7.4". rg '2.7.4'Length of output: 129
58-58: Addition of new devDependencies aligns with the PR's objectives to enhance code quality.
102-106: New scripts for language checks and commit linting added.
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.dictionary.txt (1)
99-99: Consider using the Oxford spelling "sexualized" instead of "sexualised" for consistency with international English standards.
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
Files selected for processing (7)
- .commitlintrc.json (1 hunks)
- .dictionary.txt (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/fta.yml (1 hunks)
- .knip.json (1 hunks)
- package.json (4 hunks)
- tools/constants.js (1 hunks)
- tools/fta.js (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- .commitlintrc.json
- .knip.json
- tools/constants.js
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/fta.yml
Additional Context Used
LanguageTool (2)
.dictionary.txt (2)
Near line 99: Would you like to use the Oxford spelling “sexualized”? The spelling ‘sexualised’ is also correct.
Context: ...o pre programmatically readme rest-APIs sexualised src subprojects tracking.bjoern-buettne...
Near line 103: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ...subprojects tracking.bjoern-buettner.me ui UI [email protected] winston ww...
GitHub Check Runs (1)
CodeQL success (1)
tools/fta.js: [notice] 1-8: Unused variable, import, function or class
Unused import FIRST_ARGUMENT.
Path-based Instructions (1)
tools/fta.js (1)
Pattern
**/*.js: Review the code for conformity with the .eslintrc files in / and /*/.
Additional comments not posted (3)
package.json (2)
Line range hint
58-83: Addition of new dependencies and scripts is noted. Ensure these additions are necessary and do not introduce redundancy or conflicts with existing configurations.Verification successful
The analysis of dependencies and devDependencies reveals no direct conflicts or duplications between the two sections. Each package and its version in dependencies and devDependencies are unique to their respective sections.
In the scripts section, there are no obvious redundancies or conflicts. Each script command appears to serve a unique purpose and is appropriately named to reflect its function.
Based on this analysis, CodeRabbit concludes that there are no issues of redundancy or conflict introduced by the new dependencies and scripts in the package.json file.
No conflicts or redundancies found in the new dependencies and scripts in package.json. The additions appear to be necessary and well-integrated without overlapping functionalities or version conflicts. - Dependencies and devDependencies are distinct and appropriately versioned. - Script commands are unique and serve specific, non-overlapping purposes.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential conflicts or redundancies introduced by new dependencies and scripts. # Test: List all dependencies and scripts, check for duplicates or conflicts. cat package.json | jq '.dependencies, .devDependencies, .scripts'Length of output: 2108
100-107: New scripts for language checks and git hooks are added. Verify that these scripts are integrated correctly and function as expected.tools/fta.js (1)
76-76: Previous security concern about the shell command built from environment values still stands. Ensure that the command does not depend on uncontrolled absolute paths.
Idrinth
dismissed stale reviews from marikadeveloper and coderabbitai[bot]
via
8e1ddde
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
Files selected for processing (4)
- .eslintrc.yml (1 hunks)
- package.json (4 hunks)
- tools/fta.js (1 hunks)
- tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- tsconfig.json
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- package.json
- tools/fta.js
Additional comments not posted (5)
.eslintrc.yml (5)
4-7: The extensions for ESLint configurations are correctly set to include recommended settings for ESLint, JSON, and TypeScript. This ensures a comprehensive linting process that covers general JavaScript, JSON files, and TypeScript specifics.
13-13: The parser is correctly set to@typescript-eslint/parser, which is necessary for parsing TypeScript code. This is essential for projects that use TypeScript.
85-86: Themax-lenrule is set to warn for lines longer than 80 characters, but it ignores patterns that contain 'eslint'. This might unintentionally allow some long lines if they contain the word 'eslint'. Verify if this specific ignore pattern is intentional and necessary.Verification successful
The ignore pattern 'eslint' in the
max-lenrule of.eslintrc.ymlhas been analyzed. The instances found in the codebase are comments specifically disabling ESLint rules, which is a justified use of the ignore pattern. However, CodeRabbit recommends reviewing this pattern to ensure it does not unintentionally ignore other important long lines containing the word 'eslint'.
- test/helper/function-analyzer.ts: Multiple lines with rule disabling comments.
- src/storage/noop-storage.ts: Line with rule disabling comment.
- src/progress/no-progress.ts: Line with rule disabling comment.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the necessity of the ignore pattern 'eslint' in the max-len rule. # Search for lines in the codebase that might be incorrectly ignored due to this pattern. rg --type ts --type js '.{81,}' | grep 'eslint'Length of output: 513
163-163: Thearray-bracket-newlinerule is configured to warn if there are two or more items, which helps in maintaining readability in arrays. This is a good practice for projects with complex array structures.
168-169: The rulesprefer-constandno-varare set to error, which enforces modern JavaScript practices by preferring block-scopedconstdeclarations overvar. This is beneficial for maintaining clean and modern code.
| complexity: | ||
| - error | ||
| - 5 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
The complexity rule set to 5 has been frequently overridden in the project's TypeScript and JavaScript files. This indicates that the current threshold may be too restrictive for the project's complexity needs. CodeRabbit recommends reviewing the complexity threshold to better align with the project's requirements.
- Files with complexity rule overrides:
tools/fta.jssrc/storage/storage-factory.tssrc/routes/function-analyzer.tssrc/reporter/xray-onpremise-reporter.tssrc/reporter/xray-cloud-reporter.tssrc/main.tssrc/cli/loader.tssrc/cli/cli.tssrc/cli/check-routes.ts(multiple instances)integration/prepare-temp-dir.ts
Analysis chain
The complexity rule is set to error out on a complexity of 5. This is a strict setting that helps maintain code simplicity and readability by limiting cyclomatic complexity. Consider if this threshold is appropriate for the project's complexity needs.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any overrides or comments regarding the complexity rule in the project's documentation or code comments.
# Search for mentions of 'complexity' in TypeScript and JavaScript files to understand context.
rg --type ts --type js 'complexity'
Length of output: 867
The Pull Request is ready
Overview
Framework