Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(web): Electronic registrations - Remove unused component and relevant endpoints #17357

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

RunarVestmann
Copy link
Member

@RunarVestmann RunarVestmann commented Dec 27, 2024

Electronic registrations - Remove unused component and relevant endpoints

What

  • Unused endpoints and unused component, let's remove them from the monorepo

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • Bug Fixes

    • Removed ownership entries for the electronic-registration-statistics domain.
    • Eliminated the ELECTRONIC_REGISTRATION_STATISTICS_API_URL configuration across various services.
  • New Features

    • Comprehensive updates to service configurations, including health checks and Horizontal Pod Autoscaler settings.
  • Documentation

    • Removed README files for both the electronic registration statistics API and client libraries, eliminating guidance on usage and configuration.
  • Refactor

    • Deleted multiple modules and components related to electronic registration statistics, including services, resolvers, and GraphQL input types.
    • Removed style definitions and components associated with electronic registration statistics visualizations.

@RunarVestmann RunarVestmann added the automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Dec 27, 2024
@RunarVestmann RunarVestmann requested review from a team as code owners December 27, 2024 11:33
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 27, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request involves a comprehensive removal of the electronic registration statistics functionality across multiple libraries and components. The changes include deleting entire modules, services, configurations, and related components from both the API and client libraries. The removal spans configuration files, TypeScript modules, GraphQL resolvers, and frontend components related to electronic registration statistics.

Changes

File/Path Change Summary
.github/CODEOWNERS Removed entries for electronic registration statistics domain paths
apps/api/infra/api.ts Removed ELECTRONIC_REGISTRATION_STATISTICS_API_URL configuration
apps/api/src/app/app.module.ts Removed ElectronicRegistrationsModule and ElectronicRegistrationsClientConfig
apps/web/components/connected/electronicRegistrationStatistics/ Deleted entire directory with all related components and utilities
libs/api/domains/electronic-registration-statistics/ Removed entire library with all configuration and source files
libs/clients/electronic-registration-statistics/ Removed entire client library with all configuration and source files
Various charts/islandis/values.*.yaml Removed ELECTRONIC_REGISTRATION_STATISTICS_API_URL environment variable

Suggested reviewers

  • robertaandersen
  • svanaeinars

Possibly related PRs


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f8e41a2 and 856233e.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • libs/cms/src/lib/generated/contentfulTypes.d.ts is excluded by !**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/web/utils/richText.tsx (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • apps/web/utils/richText.tsx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: prepare
  • GitHub Check: helm-values-validation

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 27, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 35.69%. Comparing base (56d6e6e) to head (856233e).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #17357      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   35.67%   35.69%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        6932     6927       -5     
  Lines      148878   148805      -73     
  Branches    42538    42515      -23     
==========================================
+ Hits        53107    53109       +2     
+ Misses      95771    95696      -75     
Flag Coverage Δ
air-discount-scheme-backend 48.24% <ø> (ø)
air-discount-scheme-web 0.00% <ø> (ø)
api 3.35% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
api-catalogue-services 75.81% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-air-discount-scheme 37.99% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-assets 26.71% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-auth-admin 48.49% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-communications 39.39% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-criminal-record 48.03% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-health-insurance 35.47% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-mortgage-certificate 35.24% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-payment-schedule 42.12% <ø> (ø)
application-api-files 61.90% <ø> (ø)
application-core 75.72% <ø> (ø)
application-system-api 38.73% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
application-template-api-modules 27.67% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
application-templates-accident-notification 27.61% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-car-recycling 3.12% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-criminal-record 25.83% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-driving-license 18.15% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-estate 13.67% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-example-payment 24.69% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-financial-aid 14.45% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-general-petition 23.12% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-inheritance-report 6.57% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-marriage-conditions 15.18% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-mortgage-certificate 43.68% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-parental-leave 29.92% <ø> (ø)
application-types 6.51% <ø> (ø)
application-ui-components 1.22% <ø> (ø)
application-ui-shell 22.26% <ø> (ø)
auth-admin-web 2.43% <ø> (ø)
auth-nest-tools 31.52% <ø> (ø)
auth-shared 75.00% <ø> (ø)
clients-charge-fjs-v2 28.88% <ø> (ø)
clients-driving-license 40.91% <ø> (ø)
clients-driving-license-book 43.92% <ø> (ø)
clients-financial-statements-inao 49.70% <ø> (ø)
clients-license-client 1.26% <ø> (ø)
clients-middlewares 72.93% <ø> (ø)
clients-regulations 43.00% <ø> (ø)
clients-rsk-company-registry 31.18% <ø> (ø)
clients-rsk-personal-tax-return 38.32% <ø> (ø)
clients-smartsolutions 12.77% <ø> (ø)
clients-syslumenn 49.47% <ø> (ø)
clients-zendesk 50.58% <ø> (ø)
cms 0.39% <ø> (ø)
cms-translations 38.73% <ø> (ø)
content-search-index-manager 95.65% <ø> (ø)
content-search-toolkit 8.16% <ø> (ø)
contentful-apps 4.69% <ø> (ø)
dokobit-signing 62.18% <ø> (ø)
email-service 60.15% <ø> (ø)
feature-flags 90.83% <ø> (ø)
file-storage 45.97% <ø> (ø)
financial-aid-backend 51.42% <ø> (ø)
financial-aid-shared 17.88% <ø> (ø)
icelandic-names-registry-backend 54.33% <ø> (ø)
infra-nest-server 48.06% <ø> (ø)
infra-tracing 69.94% <ø> (ø)
island-ui-core 30.34% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-api 20.20% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-audit-trail 69.02% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-backend 55.91% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-formatters 78.50% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-message 66.60% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-message-handler 48.33% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-scheduler 71.15% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-types 41.60% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-web 27.75% <ø> (ø)
license-api 42.94% <ø> (-0.06%) ⬇️
localization 10.15% <ø> (ø)
logging 58.02% <ø> (ø)
message-queue 67.76% <ø> (+0.70%) ⬆️
nest-audit 65.78% <ø> (ø)
nest-aws 51.93% <ø> (ø)
nest-config 76.45% <ø> (ø)
nest-core 53.16% <ø> (ø)
nest-feature-flags 51.06% <ø> (ø)
nest-problem 45.64% <ø> (ø)
nest-sequelize 94.44% <ø> (ø)
nest-swagger 51.13% <ø> (ø)
nova-sms 61.52% <ø> (ø)
portals-admin-regulations-admin 1.80% <ø> (ø)
portals-core 19.58% <ø> (ø)
regulations 16.78% <ø> (ø)
services-auth-admin-api 52.54% <ø> (ø)
services-auth-delegation-api 58.47% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
services-auth-ids-api 52.56% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
services-auth-public-api 49.43% <ø> (ø)
services-sessions 65.32% <ø> (ø)
services-university-gateway 49.46% <ø> (ø)
services-user-notification 46.50% <ø> (ø)
services-user-profile 56.97% <ø> (ø)
shared-components 29.49% <ø> (ø)
shared-form-fields 33.37% <ø> (ø)
shared-mocking 58.64% <ø> (ø)
shared-pii 92.85% <ø> (ø)
shared-problem 87.50% <ø> (ø)
shared-utils 27.69% <ø> (ø)
skilavottord-ws 24.26% <ø> (ø)
web 2.41% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
apps/api/src/app/app.module.ts 0.00% <ø> (ø)
apps/web/utils/richText.tsx 0.00% <ø> (ø)

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 56d6e6e...856233e. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Member

@robertaandersen robertaandersen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

datadog-island-is bot commented Dec 27, 2024

Datadog Report

All test runs 09d59fb 🔗

10 Total Test Services: 1 Failed, 9 Passed
🔻 Test Sessions change in coverage: 2 decreased, 2 increased, 196 no change

Test Services
This report shows up to 10 services
Service Name Failed Known Flaky New Flaky Passed Skipped Total Time Code Coverage Change Test Service View
api-domains-driving-license 3 0 0 20 0 27.88s N/A Link
air-discount-scheme-backend 0 0 0 63 0 22.46s N/A Link
air-discount-scheme-web 0 0 0 2 0 6.58s N/A Link
api 0 0 0 4 0 2.7s N/A Link
api-catalogue-services 0 0 0 23 0 11.1s N/A Link
api-domains-air-discount-scheme 0 0 0 6 0 20.01s N/A Link
api-domains-assets 0 0 0 3 0 12.03s N/A Link
api-domains-auth-admin 0 0 0 18 0 13.28s 1 no change Link
api-domains-communications 0 0 0 5 0 30.65s N/A Link
api-domains-criminal-record 0 0 0 5 0 8.37s N/A Link

❌ Failed Tests (3)

  • DrivingLicenseService getApplicationEligibility all checks should pass for applicable students - libs/api/domains/driving-license/src/lib/drivingLicense.spec.ts - Details

    Expand for error
     expect(received).toStrictEqual(expected) // deep equality
     
     - Expected  - 1
     + Received  + 1
     
     @@ -8,11 +8,11 @@
           Object {
             "key": "DrivingSchoolMissing",
             "requirementMet": true,
           },
     ...
    
  • DrivingLicenseService getApplicationEligibility all checks should pass for applicable students for temporary license - libs/api/domains/driving-license/src/lib/drivingLicense.spec.ts - Details

    Expand for error
     expect(received).toStrictEqual(expected) // deep equality
     
     - Expected  - 1
     + Received  + 1
     
     @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
       Object {
         "isEligible": true,
         "requirements": Array [
           Object {
     ...
    
  • DrivingLicenseService getApplicationEligibility checks should fail for non-applicable students - libs/api/domains/driving-license/src/lib/drivingLicense.spec.ts - Details

    Expand for error
     expect(received).toStrictEqual(expected) // deep equality
     
     - Expected  - 1
     + Received  + 1
     
     @@ -8,11 +8,11 @@
           Object {
             "key": "DrivingSchoolMissing",
             "requirementMet": false,
           },
     ...
    

🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (2)

  • services-auth-delegation-api - jest 50.45% (-0.02%) - Details
  • license-api - jest 34.12% (-0.01%) - Details

Copy link
Contributor

@magnearun magnearun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Core files lgtm

Copy link
Contributor

kodiakhq bot commented Jan 4, 2025

This PR currently has a merge conflict. Please resolve this and then re-add the automerge label.

@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot removed the automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Jan 4, 2025
@RunarVestmann RunarVestmann force-pushed the chore/web-remove-unused-electronig-registration-statistic-component branch from a5abed3 to 7272c3e Compare January 6, 2025 09:31
@RunarVestmann RunarVestmann added the automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Jan 6, 2025
@RunarVestmann RunarVestmann added automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass and removed automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass labels Jan 6, 2025
@oddsson oddsson added automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass and removed automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass labels Jan 6, 2025
@RunarVestmann RunarVestmann removed the automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Jan 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants