feat(j-s): Add a mergeCaseNumber field to case table #17507
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a new optional field Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested Labels
Suggested Reviewers
Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/dto/updateCase.dto.ts (1)
535-539: Add length validation for consistency.Other string fields in this DTO have
@MaxLengthvalidation. Consider adding it to this field as well.Apply this diff:
@IsOptional() @IsString() + @MaxLength(255) @ApiPropertyOptional({ type: String }) readonly mergeCaseNumber?: stringapps/judicial-system/web/src/components/FormProvider/case.graphql (1)
393-393: Improve schema organization and documentation.
- Consider moving
mergeCaseNumbernear the existing merge-related fields (mergeCaseandmergedCases) to maintain logical grouping.- Add documentation comments to describe the purpose and usage of this field.
- Explicitly define the field type for better schema clarity.
mergedCases { # ... existing fields ... } + """ + The case number of another case that this case will be merged into. + """ + mergeCaseNumber: String civilClaimants { # ... existing fields ... } - mergeCaseNumber
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
apps/judicial-system/api/src/app/modules/case/dto/updateCase.input.ts(1 hunks)apps/judicial-system/api/src/app/modules/case/models/case.model.ts(1 hunks)apps/judicial-system/backend/migrations/20250115095654-update-case.js(1 hunks)apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/case.service.ts(1 hunks)apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/dto/updateCase.dto.ts(1 hunks)apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/guards/rolesRules.ts(1 hunks)apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/models/case.model.ts(1 hunks)apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/FormProvider/case.graphql(1 hunks)apps/judicial-system/web/src/utils/hooks/useCase/updateCase.graphql(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (9)
apps/judicial-system/api/src/app/modules/case/dto/updateCase.input.ts (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/dto/updateCase.dto.ts (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/api/src/app/modules/case/models/case.model.ts (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/utils/hooks/useCase/updateCase.graphql (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/FormProvider/case.graphql (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/migrations/20250115095654-update-case.js (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/case.service.ts (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/guards/rolesRules.ts (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/models/case.model.ts (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
📓 Learnings (4)
apps/judicial-system/api/src/app/modules/case/dto/updateCase.input.ts (1)
Learnt from: unakb
PR: island-is/island.is#15508
File: apps/judicial-system/api/src/app/modules/case/dto/updateCase.input.ts:505-508
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T15:15:26.274Z
Learning: Validation for `mergeCaseId` is performed consistently in the backend API, making additional validation in the DTO class redundant.
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/dto/updateCase.dto.ts (2)
Learnt from: unakb
PR: island-is/island.is#15508
File: apps/judicial-system/api/src/app/modules/case/dto/updateCase.input.ts:505-508
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T15:15:11.835Z
Learning: Validation for `mergeCaseId` is performed consistently in the backend API, making additional validation in the DTO class redundant.
Learnt from: gudjong
PR: island-is/island.is#16924
File: apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/dto/updateCase.dto.ts:69-74
Timestamp: 2024-11-18T15:21:28.715Z
Learning: The `policeCaseNumbers` field in `UpdateCaseDto` in `apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/dto/updateCase.dto.ts` already includes the `@ArrayMinSize(1)` and `@MaxLength(255)` decorators for validation.
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/case.service.ts (1)
Learnt from: unakb
PR: island-is/island.is#15508
File: apps/judicial-system/api/src/app/modules/case/dto/updateCase.input.ts:505-508
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T15:15:11.835Z
Learning: Validation for `mergeCaseId` is performed consistently in the backend API, making additional validation in the DTO class redundant.
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/models/case.model.ts (1)
Learnt from: unakb
PR: island-is/island.is#15508
File: apps/judicial-system/api/src/app/modules/case/dto/updateCase.input.ts:505-508
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T15:15:26.274Z
Learning: Validation for `mergeCaseId` is performed consistently in the backend API, making additional validation in the DTO class redundant.
🔇 Additional comments (9)
apps/judicial-system/backend/migrations/20250115095654-update-case.js (1)
1-24: LGTM! Migration is well-structured and follows best practices.The migration correctly:
- Uses a transaction for atomicity
- Makes the column nullable
- Follows naming conventions
- Provides rollback functionality
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/guards/rolesRules.ts (1)
109-109: LGTM! Appropriate role-based access control.The field is correctly added to
districtCourtFields, restricting updates to district court roles.apps/judicial-system/api/src/app/modules/case/dto/updateCase.input.ts (1)
510-514: LGTM! Field is properly defined with appropriate decorators.The implementation follows the established patterns and aligns with the retrieved learning about validation being handled in the backend API.
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/case.service.ts (1)
178-178: LGTM! The mergeCaseNumber field is properly added to the UpdateCase interface.The field is correctly included in the list of properties that can be updated, maintaining alphabetical ordering.
apps/judicial-system/web/src/utils/hooks/useCase/updateCase.graphql (1)
227-227: LGTM! The mergeCaseNumber field is properly added to the GraphQL schema.The field is correctly included in the UpdateCase mutation response, maintaining a logical grouping with other merge-related fields.
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/FormProvider/case.graphql (1)
393-393: Verify relationship with existing merge functionality.Please clarify:
- How does
mergeCaseNumberrelate to the existingmergeCase.courtCaseNumber? They seem to serve similar purposes.- What is the difference between RVG and non-RVG case merging that necessitates this new field?
✅ Verification successful
The fields serve different purposes for RVG vs non-RVG case merging
The two fields are intentionally distinct:
mergeCase.courtCaseNumberis used for displaying information about cases merged within the RVG systemmergeCaseNumberis specifically added to enable merging with cases that exist outside the RVG systemThis separation is appropriate since merging with external cases requires different handling than internal RVG case merges.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of existing merge-related fields to understand the current merge functionality rg -A 5 "mergeCase.*courtCaseNumber|mergeCaseNumber" --type tsLength of output: 4087
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for merge implementation and RVG-specific code echo "=== Searching for merge implementation ===" ast-grep --pattern 'function $FUNC($_) { $$$ merge$$$ $$$ }' echo -e "\n=== Searching for RVG-specific code ===" rg "RVK|RVG" --type ts -B 2 -A 2Length of output: 118498
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for merge implementation and RVG vs non-RVG handling echo "=== Searching for merge implementation ===" ast-grep --pattern 'function $FUNC($_) { $$$ merge$$$ $$$ }' echo -e "\n=== Searching for RVG vs non-RVG case handling ===" rg "RVG|non-RVG" --type ts -A 3 -B 3 echo -e "\n=== Searching for mergeCase usage ===" rg "mergeCase" --type ts -A 3 -B 3Length of output: 108678
apps/judicial-system/api/src/app/modules/case/models/case.model.ts (1)
457-459: LGTM! The field implementation follows GraphQL model best practices.The new
mergeCaseNumberfield is properly implemented with correct typing and decorators, maintaining consistency with the codebase patterns.apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/models/case.model.ts (2)
1064-1066: LGTM! Documentation update is clear and consistent.The updated documentation for
mergedCasesrelation follows the established documentation style and clearly describes its purpose.
1071-1077: LGTM! Field implementation follows Sequelize model best practices.The new
mergeCaseNumberfield is properly implemented with:
- Clear documentation following the file's convention
- Correct Sequelize decorators
- Appropriate type and nullability settings
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #17507 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 35.60% 35.60%
=======================================
Files 7015 7015
Lines 150300 150303 +3
Branches 42936 42936
=======================================
+ Hits 53519 53522 +3
Misses 96781 96781
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 9 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 9 Passed Test Services
🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (1)
|
oddsson
added
the
deprecated:automerge
Add a mergeCaseNumber field to case table
Asana
What
Add a mergeCaseNumber field to case table
Why
This is step one in enabling merging a case with a case that is not in RVG.
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Technical Improvements
Data Model Updates
mergeCaseNumberfield in case-related data transfer objects and models