Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix for Issue-1140 - cancel running jobs on merge request update when source branch is same #1268

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Fix for Issue-1140 - cancel running jobs on merge request update when source branch is same #1268

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

RemigiuszDudek
Copy link

No description provided.

@RemigiuszDudek RemigiuszDudek requested a review from a team as a code owner March 26, 2022 09:37
@RemigiuszDudek RemigiuszDudek mentioned this pull request Mar 26, 2022
Open
@RemigiuszDudek RemigiuszDudek force-pushed the issue-1140-cancel-running-jobs-on-merge-request branch 2 times, most recently from 1ca69d6 to 97c932e Compare March 29, 2022 07:54
@RemigiuszDudek RemigiuszDudek force-pushed the issue-1140-cancel-running-jobs-on-merge-request branch from 97c932e to 7d8a8c3 Compare May 15, 2022 13:25
@RemigiuszDudek RemigiuszDudek force-pushed the issue-1140-cancel-running-jobs-on-merge-request branch from 7d8a8c3 to a0a9449 Compare June 15, 2022 09:06
@RemigiuszDudek RemigiuszDudek force-pushed the issue-1140-cancel-running-jobs-on-merge-request branch from a0a9449 to 4467eb9 Compare August 30, 2022 04:22
@RemigiuszDudek RemigiuszDudek changed the title Issue-1140 - cancel running jobs on merge request update when source branch is same Fix for Issue-1140 - cancel running jobs on merge request update when source branch is same Aug 31, 2022
@RemigiuszDudek
Copy link
Author

fixes #1140

@RemigiuszDudek RemigiuszDudek force-pushed the issue-1140-cancel-running-jobs-on-merge-request branch from 4467eb9 to c1dc9b9 Compare October 23, 2022 05:48
MarkEWaite
MarkEWaite requested changes Oct 23, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@MarkEWaite MarkEWaite left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I personally think that it is better to leave this decision to the author of the Pipeline and its Jenkinsfile rather than always stopping a previous build when newer changes arrive.

See the disableConcurrentBuilds task as it is used in the Jenkins plugin build process

@MarkEWaite MarkEWaite added the bug For changelog: Minor bug. Will be listed after features label Nov 22, 2022
@dwzg
Copy link

dwzg commented Apr 3, 2023

I don't think disableConcurrentBuilds is an adequate alternative to the functionality from this PR. When multiple Merge Request are triggering the same job, I don't want to just cancel any running build, only those which were triggered from the same MR and are thus outdated. From looking at disableConcurrentBuilds(abortPrevious: true), any running build will be aborted. The GitLab plugin already has this function, but only for pending builds.

@krisstern krisstern closed this Apr 3, 2023
@krisstern krisstern reopened this Apr 3, 2023
@Alena00-1
Copy link

Good day.
A much needed fix. This is a really cool thing.
When can we expect these fixes?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@MarkEWaite MarkEWaite MarkEWaite requested changes

Requested changes must be addressed to merge this pull request.

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug For changelog: Minor bug. Will be listed after features
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@RemigiuszDudek @dwzg @Alena00-1 @MarkEWaite @krisstern