Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

use request-based RMA sync #52

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

jeffhammond
Copy link
Contributor

correct fix for #51

related to https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg30676.html

Signed-off-by: Jeff Hammond [email protected]

@janciesko
Copy link
Contributor

This looks good. Am I correct to assume that the RPut and RGet + waiting for the request completion is faster than the flush? In the first case, this would be waiting for local completion.

@janciesko janciesko requested a review from Rombur August 5, 2022 19:36
@jeffhammond
Copy link
Contributor Author

There reasons why it should be faster and it may be in practice in most cases you care about, but the specification doesn't assume that, and it's possible some implementations will favor flush. Flush is more like SHMEM...

@janciesko
Copy link
Contributor

Superseded by #53

@janciesko janciesko closed this Aug 8, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants