Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[vpj] Replace org.apache.kafka.common.TopicPartition with PubSubTopicPartition in VPJ #1460

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 22, 2025

Conversation

sushantmane
Copy link
Collaborator

@sushantmane sushantmane commented Jan 21, 2025

Replace org.apache.kafka.common.TopicPartition with PubSubTopicPartition in VPJ

Replace the usage of Kafka TopicPartition with Venice PubSubOffset instances to enable support for non-Kafka
pub-sub clients. This change is part of the broader effort to decouple Venice from Kafka-specific classes and
ensure compatibility with other pub-sub systems.

How was this PR tested?

Does this PR introduce any user-facing changes?

  • No. You can skip the rest of this section.
  • Yes. Make sure to explain your proposed changes and call out the behavior change.

@sushantmane sushantmane requested a review from haoxu07 January 21, 2025 23:21
@sushantmane sushantmane marked this pull request as ready for review January 21, 2025 23:24
@sushantmane sushantmane enabled auto-merge (squash) January 21, 2025 23:49
Copy link
Contributor

@haoxu07 haoxu07 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall LGTM!, just left minor comments.

@sushantmane sushantmane merged commit cd915b9 into linkedin:main Jan 22, 2025
57 checks passed
@sushantmane
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thanks, @haoxu07!

@sushantmane sushantmane deleted the pubsub-improvements branch January 22, 2025 01:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants