Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

all: upgrade to golangci-lint v1.55.2 #149

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 8, 2024

Conversation

mmcloughlin
Copy link
Owner

Upgrade golangci-lint to address a bug triggered since Go 1.21.5.

See: golangci/golangci-lint#3718
See: golang/go#64592

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 8, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (005a79b) 73.93% compared to head (956b6a5) 73.93%.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #149   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   73.93%   73.93%           
=======================================
  Files          36       36           
  Lines        2179     2179           
=======================================
  Hits         1611     1611           
  Misses        494      494           
  Partials       74       74           
Flag Coverage Δ
stress ?
unittests 73.93% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mmcloughlin mmcloughlin changed the title upgrade golangci lint 1.55.2 all: upgrade to golangci-lint v1.55.2 Jan 8, 2024
@mmcloughlin mmcloughlin merged commit caa8e18 into master Jan 8, 2024
3 checks passed
@mmcloughlin mmcloughlin deleted the upgrade-golangci-lint-1.55.2 branch January 8, 2024 01:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants