RISC-V: added RVV 1.0 weekly build #165
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mshabunin
force-pushed
the
add-rvv10
branch
3 times, most recently
from
9d8508b to
fb6ea8c
Compare
2 tasks
asmorkalov
pushed a commit
to opencv/opencv
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 9, 2024
imgproc: fix unaligned memory access in filters and Gaussian blur #25364 * filter/SIMD: removed parts which casted 8u pointers to int causing unaligned memory access on RISC-V platform. * GaussianBlur/fixed_point: replaced casts from s16 to u32 with union operations Performance comparison: - [x] check performance on x86_64 - (4 threads, `-DCPU_BASELINE=AVX2`, GCC 11.4, Ubuntu 22) - [report_imgproc_x86_64.ods](https://github.com/opencv/opencv/files/14904702/report_x86_64.ods) - [x] check performance on AArch64 - (4 cores of RK3588, GCC 11.4 aarch64, Raspbian) - [report_imgproc_aarch64.ods](https://github.com/opencv/opencv/files/14908437/report_aarch64.ods) Note: for some reason my performance results are quite unstable, unaffected functions show speedups and slowdowns in many cases. Filter2D and GaussianBlur seem to be OK. Slightly related PR: opencv/ci-gha-workflow#165
mshabunin
added a commit
to mshabunin/opencv
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 9, 2024
imgproc: fix unaligned memory access in filters and Gaussian blur opencv#25364 * filter/SIMD: removed parts which casted 8u pointers to int causing unaligned memory access on RISC-V platform. * GaussianBlur/fixed_point: replaced casts from s16 to u32 with union operations Performance comparison: - [x] check performance on x86_64 - (4 threads, `-DCPU_BASELINE=AVX2`, GCC 11.4, Ubuntu 22) - [report_imgproc_x86_64.ods](https://github.com/opencv/opencv/files/14904702/report_x86_64.ods) - [x] check performance on AArch64 - (4 cores of RK3588, GCC 11.4 aarch64, Raspbian) - [report_imgproc_aarch64.ods](https://github.com/opencv/opencv/files/14908437/report_aarch64.ods) Note: for some reason my performance results are quite unstable, unaffected functions show speedups and slowdowns in many cases. Filter2D and GaussianBlur seem to be OK. Slightly related PR: opencv/ci-gha-workflow#165
This was referenced Apr 9, 2024
|
Created two more PRs to fix tests on 4.x and 5.x branches. |
asmorkalov
pushed a commit
to opencv/opencv
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 10, 2024
Fix unaligned filters + increase test thresholds (5.x) #25379 Port of #25364 to 5.x + minor changes in 3d tests to pass on RISC-V platform Failed tests: ``` [ RUN ] AP3P.ctheta1p_nan_23607 /home/ci/opencv/modules/3d/test/test_solvepnp_ransac.cpp:2320: Failure Expected: (cvtest::norm(res.colRange(0, 2), expected, NORM_INF)) <= (3e-16), actual: 3.33067e-16 vs 3e-16 [ FAILED ] AP3P.ctheta1p_nan_23607 (1 ms) [ RUN ] Rendering/RenderingTest.accuracy/4, where GetParam() = ((320, 240), Flat, CW, Color, CV_32F, CV_32S) /home/ci/opencv/modules/3d/test/test_rendering.cpp:430: Failure Expected: (normL2Depth) <= (normL2Threshold), actual: 0.00102317 vs 0.000989 [ FAILED ] Rendering/RenderingTest.accuracy/4, where GetParam() = ((320, 240), Flat, CW, Color, CV_32F, CV_32S) (22 ms) [ RUN ] Rendering/RenderingTest.accuracy/5, where GetParam() = ((320, 240), Shaded, None, Color, CV_32F, CV_32S) /home/ci/opencv/modules/3d/test/test_rendering.cpp:430: Failure Expected: (normL2Depth) <= (normL2Threshold), actual: 0.00102317 vs 0.000989 [ FAILED ] Rendering/RenderingTest.accuracy/5, where GetParam() = ((320, 240), Shaded, None, Color, CV_32F, CV_32S) (22 ms) [ RUN ] Rendering/RenderingTest.accuracy/8, where GetParam() = ((320, 240), Flat, CW, Clipping, CV_32F, CV_32S) /home/ci/opencv/modules/3d/test/test_rendering.cpp:430: Failure Expected: (normL2Depth) <= (normL2Threshold), actual: 0.00162132 vs 0.0016 [ FAILED ] Rendering/RenderingTest.accuracy/8, where GetParam() = ((320, 240), Flat, CW, Clipping, CV_32F, CV_32S) (22 ms) [ RUN ] Rendering/RenderingTest.accuracy/9, where GetParam() = ((320, 240), Shaded, None, Clipping, CV_32F, CV_32S) /home/ci/opencv/modules/3d/test/test_rendering.cpp:430: Failure Expected: (normL2Depth) <= (normL2Threshold), actual: 0.000554117 vs 0.000544 [ FAILED ] Rendering/RenderingTest.accuracy/9, where GetParam() = ((320, 240), Shaded, None, Clipping, CV_32F, CV_32S) (27 ms) ``` Related CI PR: opencv/ci-gha-workflow#165
susumu-iino
pushed a commit
to susumu-iino/opencv
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 11, 2024
imgproc: fix unaligned memory access in filters and Gaussian blur opencv#25364 * filter/SIMD: removed parts which casted 8u pointers to int causing unaligned memory access on RISC-V platform. * GaussianBlur/fixed_point: replaced casts from s16 to u32 with union operations Performance comparison: - [x] check performance on x86_64 - (4 threads, `-DCPU_BASELINE=AVX2`, GCC 11.4, Ubuntu 22) - [report_imgproc_x86_64.ods](https://github.com/opencv/opencv/files/14904702/report_x86_64.ods) - [x] check performance on AArch64 - (4 cores of RK3588, GCC 11.4 aarch64, Raspbian) - [report_imgproc_aarch64.ods](https://github.com/opencv/opencv/files/14908437/report_aarch64.ods) Note: for some reason my performance results are quite unstable, unaffected functions show speedups and slowdowns in many cases. Filter2D and GaussianBlur seem to be OK. Slightly related PR: opencv/ci-gha-workflow#165
klatism
pushed a commit
to klatism/opencv
that referenced
this pull request
May 17, 2024
imgproc: fix unaligned memory access in filters and Gaussian blur opencv#25364 * filter/SIMD: removed parts which casted 8u pointers to int causing unaligned memory access on RISC-V platform. * GaussianBlur/fixed_point: replaced casts from s16 to u32 with union operations Performance comparison: - [x] check performance on x86_64 - (4 threads, `-DCPU_BASELINE=AVX2`, GCC 11.4, Ubuntu 22) - [report_imgproc_x86_64.ods](https://github.com/opencv/opencv/files/14904702/report_x86_64.ods) - [x] check performance on AArch64 - (4 cores of RK3588, GCC 11.4 aarch64, Raspbian) - [report_imgproc_aarch64.ods](https://github.com/opencv/opencv/files/14908437/report_aarch64.ods) Note: for some reason my performance results are quite unstable, unaffected functions show speedups and slowdowns in many cases. Filter2D and GaussianBlur seem to be OK. Slightly related PR: opencv/ci-gha-workflow#165
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Build using clang (same as in precommit), test on CanMV-K230 board.