This application provides a reference for using Oso Cloud's local authorization to create a multi-tenant customer relationship manager (CRM) application with a microservice architecture.
The application includes a multi-tenant-enabled user management system, which lets you create organizations (tenants), as well as users within those tenants with specific roles. When running the app, you have a super-admin like impersonation privilege that lets you view the application state as any given user.
The main purpose of the application is to demonstrate Oso's ability to handle customer relationship managers, akin to Salesforce.
The CRM application focuses on two objects:
- Opportunities, which are potential business contracts
- Territories, which can be assigned to users and can have opportunities assigned to them
Customer relationship managers are very complex, which the application model mirrors. To help develop a sense of what the application does, we'll focus on which roles a user can have on an organization and what that entitles them to do.
admin
s are super users which can create new users and assign top-level
territories.
In this application, only the root
user in the _root
organization can also
create more organizations/tenants.
Analysts have the ability to see the amount of all opportunities throughout the organization.
If an opportunity is in the negotiating stage, it can be assigned to a
deal_desk
member. Once it's assigned, the user has the ability to view and
change the opportunity's details––namely its amount and status.
sales
users represent the most complex interactions in the application.
sales
users can:
- Assign other
sales
users responsibility for their sub-territories. If the user is responsible forUSA
, they can also assign the same responsibility to othersales
users. - Create new opportunities in any territory that they're responsible for.
- Assign other
sales
users to opportunities in territories they're responsible for. - Assign
deal_desk
users to opportunities in the negotiating stage. - Change the stage and amount of opportunities to which they're assigned. Mangers of the assignee may also change these values.
- View the amounts of any opportunities in territories for which they're responsible.
- Oso Cloud w/ both centralized and local authorization
- Docker Compose
- Next.js with React server components for the backend
- PostgreSQL
The project contains many reference files, which provide realistic examples of how to accomplish complex tasks in your own application.
File | Description |
---|---|
oso_policy.polar |
A complex policy demonstrating RBAC, ReBAC, ABAC, and field-level access |
oso_local_auth*.yml |
Per-serivce local auth configuration |
actions/*.ts |
Node.js SDK authorization enforcement w/ React server components. For more details, see Enforcement patterns |
app/**/*.tsx |
React frontend integrating with authorization-oriented backend |
lib/oso.ts |
Oso client generation/config |
Different components offer different examples of authorization patterns:
Component | File | Pattern |
---|---|---|
Organization (tenants) |
/actions/org.ts |
RBAC: multi-tenancy, global roles |
User within Organization |
/actions/user.ts |
ReBAC: user-resource relations, recursive |
Territory |
/actions/crm.ts |
RBAC: resource roles, ReBAC: recursive |
Opportunity |
/actions/crm.ts |
RBAC: resource roles, ReBAC: user-resource relations, Field-level |
To manage authorization data, Oso offers a service to sync data to Oso's centralized authorization data. However, the syncing service is only available to customers at the Growth tier or above.
We've included details for using the sync service for documentation purposes, but commented out places where it would run.
env_template_oso_sync.yml
Dockerfile.oso_reconcile
docker-compose.yml
The physical application that gets built via Docker compose is:
- Next.js with React server components for the backend
- PostgreSQL
The React server components that constitute the backend authorize requests using Oso Cloud using local authorization.
However, the logical application that gets built mimics a microservice architecture, primarily enforced by creating distinct databases for each service. In the case of this application, the two services are:
- User management, which creates organizations and users
- CRM, which lets users manage opportunities and territories
The backend, though physically unified, behaves as if it is not and uses separate clients to connect to both the PG database and Oso Cloud.
In this diagram, the lines connecting the backend services represent distinct clients.
next.js
┌────────────────┬───────────────────┐
│ frontend │ backend │ PG DB
│ │┌─────────┐ │ ┌─────────┐
│ ││ /users ┼────────┼───► Users │
│ │└──▲──────┘ │ │ │
│ │ │┌─────────┐ │ ├─────────┤
│ │ ││ /crm ┼────┼───► CRM │
│ │ │└────────▲┘ │ └─────────┘
└────────────────┴───┼─────────┼─────┘
│ │
┌▼─────────▼──┐
│ Oso Cloud │
└─────────────┘
With a microservice architecture like the one laid out above, services do not
have access to each others' data. This means that even though authorization
decisions made in many services will depend on the /users
service, they cannot
access it directly.
To handle this complexity, Oso offers centralized authorization
data. In this
application, it means that as the /users
service performs CRUD operations on
its database, it also needs to propagate those changes to Oso Cloud. This way,
when the /crm
service needs to enforce authorization, it can do so with the
copy of the /users
data that Oso Cloud has.
Further, because Oso's local authorization considers centralized authorization
data when generating SQL expressions, the /crm
service can still use local
authorization.
-
Create an API key for the application. Make sure you save this!
-
Copy
/oso-policy.polar
as the policy in the environment by deploying it. -
Convert
.env.example
to.env
with the appropriate values set, e.g.OSO_CLOUD_API_KEY
. -
Install the dependencies using a Node.JS package manager, such as
npm
oryarn
. -
Run the app locally via:
docker compose up --build
Note the provided
docker-compose.yml
file makes the PostgreSQL container accessible from the host machine on port5433
. This should reduce the likelihood of interfering with any local PostgresSQL instances. Within Docker compose network, it still runs on the standard port,5432
.If that port fails to work, grep for it in the provided code and change it to any other value.
-
Load the app at
http://localhost:3000
From here you can create and manage:
Organization
User
Opportunity
Territory
Here is an example set of tasks:
-
Using
root
, create a new organization. -
Create a new
admin
user in that organization. -
Switch to the new admin user, and create a new
sales
user. Imagine this is your head of sales. -
Go to the Territories tab and assign the new
sales
user responsibility forUSA
. -
Create another new sales user with the head of sales as their manager. Imagine this is a regional VP. Repeat this process two more times.
-
Create a new deal_desk user.
-
Create a new analyst user.
-
Switch to the head of sales. Go to the Territories tab and assign regional territories to your new users.
-
Switch to one of the regional VPs and create some deals in their regions, assigning them to the regional VP and filling out their totals. Move some of the deals into the closed-won stage.
Repeat this process for the other regional VPs.
As you'll see, the regional VPs' sales reports only update for the regions they're responsible for. For example, you should not see the report totaled for the USA region.
-
For one of the deals that is not closed-won yet, move it to the negotiating stage. Then assign it to the deal_desk user.
-
Switch to the deal_desk user. The opportunity shows up as editable for the user. Modify its value and change its status to closed-won. This should then update the sales report to show for this user.
-
Switch to the analyst user. The sales report should show all of the regions' reports.
-
Switch back to the head of sales user, which should have the same report as the analyst.
TODO: Add a style to the app. Currently, the GUI is entirely unstyled HTML.