Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Making this project Cloud compatible and EOSC infrastructure runs #45

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

guillaumeeb
Copy link
Member

Hi everyone.

cc @tinaok @sebastian-luna-valero.

So I'm trying to revive this project, and to make it Cloud (Dask-gateway for the time being) compatible. I wanted to make this work apparent through this PR to get some early feedback if people have some.

In particular, I have a high level question, maybe to @rabernat: is this the good place to start a benchmarking for Cloud infrastructure performances using Pangeo? Should I look somewhere else ?

And more related to this project, I am under the impression that there have been evolutions across time that have not been reflected in Yaml configuration files, am I correct @andersy005 or @kmpaul if you ever remember? For example, trying to use cheyenne.yaml throws this:

(notebook) jovyan@jupyter-geynardbontemps:~/benchmarking$ ./pangeobench run benchmark-configs/cheyenne.yaml 
Reading configuration YAML config file
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/jovyan/benchmarking/./pangeobench", line 101, in <module>
    main()
  File "/srv/conda/envs/notebook/lib/python3.9/site-packages/click/core.py", line 1130, in __call__
    return self.main(*args, **kwargs)
  File "/srv/conda/envs/notebook/lib/python3.9/site-packages/click/core.py", line 1055, in main
    rv = self.invoke(ctx)
  File "/srv/conda/envs/notebook/lib/python3.9/site-packages/click/core.py", line 1657, in invoke
    return _process_result(sub_ctx.command.invoke(sub_ctx))
  File "/srv/conda/envs/notebook/lib/python3.9/site-packages/click/core.py", line 1404, in invoke
    return ctx.invoke(self.callback, **ctx.params)
  File "/srv/conda/envs/notebook/lib/python3.9/site-packages/click/core.py", line 760, in invoke
    return __callback(*args, **kwargs)
  File "/home/jovyan/benchmarking/./pangeobench", line 44, in run
    runner.run()
  File "/home/jovyan/benchmarking/benchmarks/utils.py", line 125, in run
    operation_choice = self.params['operation_choice']
KeyError: 'operation_choice'
(notebook) jovyan@jupyter-geynardbontemps:~/benchmarking$ 

Question is: should we keep and update those files, or just throw them away?

Any other advice welcome!

@guillaumeeb
Copy link
Member Author

The original issue for Performance test is there: pangeo-data/pangeo-eosc#16.

@rabernat
Copy link
Member

This repository is completely abandoned afaik. 🙃

I have come to believe that benchmarking is a very difficult exercise to do correctly.

My latest, best effort is here: https://gallery.pangeo.io/repos/earthcube2020/ec20_abernathey_etal/cloud_storage.html

@guillaumeeb
Copy link
Member Author

I have come to believe that benchmarking is a very difficult exercise to do correctly.

@rabernat Certainly!!

Thanks for the link, I'll try to take inspiration from it if I pursue here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants