Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Changed: Followed actual implementation. #83

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

t-matsudate
Copy link

@t-matsudate t-matsudate commented Jul 27, 2024

This change corresponds to phel-lang/phel-lang#725

@Chemaclass
Copy link
Member

Can you write an automated phel test showing that the code works this way as well, please?

@t-matsudate
Copy link
Author

@Chemaclass Sorry! Which repository should I write? Is it ok in phel-lang/phel-lang?

@t-matsudate
Copy link
Author

I wrote those tests.
phel-lang/phel-lang#740

@Chemaclass
Copy link
Member

@jenshaase what do you think about this?

@jenshaase
Copy link
Member

@Chemaclass I added my comment in the ticket: phel-lang/phel-lang#725

@Chemaclass
Copy link
Member

Thanks again for this PR. However, the goal should be:

  • allow redefining def in the REPL for pragmatic reasons
  • aim for immutability for def on non-REPL execution

Therefore, I suggest leaving the docs as it is, and focus fixing the "bug" instead (eg phel-lang/phel-lang#726 )

@Chemaclass Chemaclass closed this Jan 21, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants