generated from privacycg/template
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Monkey patch for non-cookie storage access #47
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
fd0c88f
Starting: iframe and CHIPS access
amaliev 7334844
Non-cookie storage access monkey patch
amaliev c50fcf8
Switch to obtain bottle map
amaliev 8f6d2fe
Adding service worker activation
amaliev 2a44087
Update index.bs
amaliev 042af62
Consolidate navigation storage access algo
amaliev cb03d25
client -> reserved client
amaliev File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For some reason github is not showing me the steps for this algorithm anywhere, but I can see them in the preview.
The preview says that we are looking at the request's client. I think for this case we actually want reserved client instead:
https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-request-reserved-client
The reserved client is the target container for the new document. The client is the container of the document that initiated the navigation. Sometimes they are the same (click a link in a tab to navigate the tab), but sometimes they are different (click a link that opens a new tab).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This algorithm was already written in the previous PR, it replaces "process a network cookie access for bounce tracking mitigations" since it looks like they're identical.
Makes sense, does that mean we want the same fix for cookie writes as well? It sounds like we should always use the request's "reserved client" when checking the destination navigable.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"reserved client" is only used for document and iframe requests. Its confusing.
So maybe the cookie access thing needs to check one or the other depending on destination.