Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PEP 3119: Revert the link for 'Putting Metaclasses to Work' (Forman & Danforth) #3289

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

AA-Turner
Copy link
Member

@AA-Turner AA-Turner commented Aug 14, 2023


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--3289.org.readthedocs.build/

@gvanrossum
Copy link
Member

Maybe wait until the link actually stops working? Though I still don’t understand how one is supposed to find that link (other than a Google search, which could be seeded by this very PEP).

If we decide to remove this we should remove the other one in PEP 551.

@shailshouryya
Copy link
Contributor

shailshouryya commented Aug 15, 2023

I didn't look through the archive.org link properly until after typing this out, at which point I realized I was talking about an entirely different scenario (archiving the link to the Amazon product page of the book, as opposed to the actual book) and what I typed out does not apply. However, I don't want to delete the entire thing, and maybe someone finds something useful out of it for some other purpose.

Also some context for others who might need to do some digging (the lawsuit is mentioned the linked issue #3259 above, but adding references):

therefore, the archive.org link will likely go away if the publishers have their way.

Also, here's a direct link to the relevant section of the preview: https://pep-previews--3289.org.readthedocs.build/pep-3119/#references



The original thing I typed (which is not relevant, see above):

(Adding here in case this is useful)

Since https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0201433052 is just a link to buy the book, the link should hopefully stay unaffected by the lawsuit (I think?). However, if the entire organization goes down, then the link will probably disappear - at that point, though, the entire site will probably go down at that point, along with all the other links there.

It looks like there are some alternatives to archive.org, and I was going through https://www.searchenginejournal.com/wayback-machine-5-alternatives-to-try/477224/ to see what they're like, but I haven't really tried them yet.

Short summary based off some (very light) research:

There's also this list, but going through that will take even more time (but maybe we can get feedback if anyone has tried any of them before).

@hugovk hugovk changed the title Revert the link for 'Putting Metaclasses to Work' (Forman & Danforth) PEP 3119: Revert the link for 'Putting Metaclasses to Work' (Forman & Danforth) Aug 28, 2023
@hugovk
Copy link
Member

hugovk commented Sep 20, 2023

Resolved conflict, and marking as draft until the link stops working.

@hugovk hugovk marked this pull request as draft September 20, 2023 19:04
@hugovk
Copy link
Member

hugovk commented Nov 24, 2024

Maybe wait until the link actually stops working?

15 months on, and the archive.org link still works. Shall we close this?

(If we did change the link, rather than Amazon I'd prefer to use the author's, publisher's or a library catalogue page.)

Copy link
Member

@gvanrossum gvanrossum left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not keep both links? We can take the archives.org link down when archives.org removes it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants