Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Downgrade gvisor-tap-vsock to v0.7.5 #8091

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Nino-K
Copy link
Member

@Nino-K Nino-K commented Jan 15, 2025

As part of the 1.17.0 release, we upgraded the gvisor-tap-vsock library to version v0.8.1. However, this version has caused issues with DNS resolution behind VPNs and other name resolution problems. To address these issues, we are planning to release a patch, and this downgrade is part of that solution.

Related to: #8055

Nino-K and others added 2 commits January 15, 2025 10:20
As part of the 1.17.0 release, we upgraded the gvisor-tap-vsock library to version v0.8.1.
However, this version has caused issues with DNS resolution behind VPNs and other name resolution problems.
To address these issues, we are planning to release a patch, and this downgrade is part of that solution.

Signed-off-by: Nino Kodabande <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rancher Desktop Dependency Manager <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@jandubois jandubois left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The 2nd commit reverts the 1st commit, so this PR is empty.

Also when you downgrade gvisor-tap-vsock to 0.7.5, you need to also rewrite the reference from inet.af to github.com (see lima-vm/lima@7602e74). There must not be any reference to inet.af in go.sum.

EDIT:

Updated downgrade PR is at rancher-sandbox/lima#155. It also downgrades gvisor.dev/gvisor to a compatible version (only had compilation errors on Linux, not macOS, without that downgrade).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants