.,

rdmorganiser · Apr 25, 2024 · 2fc17ca · 2fc17ca
1 parent 24cc9ab
commit 2fc17ca
Showing 1 changed file with 2 additions and 2 deletions.
diff --git a/rdmorganiser/questions/snf.xml b/rdmorganiser/questions/snf.xml
@@ -791,7 +791,7 @@ Ebenso wie bei den Formaten gilt hier: je standardisierter, offener und etablier
 		<uri_prefix>https://rdmorganiser.github.io/terms</uri_prefix>
 		<key>technical-integration</key>
 		<path>snf/content-classification/technical-integration</path>
-		<dc:comment>the stipulation that re-used and created data are of the same type (= and thus capable to be integrated) is problematic, since this implies properties of the  data that are not a given. May be this shoud be reformulated to: Is the connection between re-used and created data ensured? (which goes into the provenance realm)</dc:comment>
+		<dc:comment>The stipulation that re-used and created data are of the same type (= and thus capable to be integrated) is problematic, since this implies properties of the  data that are not a given. May be this shoud be reformulated to: Is the connection between re-used and created data ensured? (which goes into the provenance realm)</dc:comment>
 		<attribute/>
 		<section dc:uri="https://rdmorganiser.github.io/terms/questions/snf/content-classification"/>
 		<is_collection>False</is_collection>
@@ -810,7 +810,7 @@ Ebenso wie bei den Formaten gilt hier: je standardisierter, offener und etablier
 		<uri_prefix>https://rdmorganiser.github.io/terms</uri_prefix>
 		<key>integration</key>
 		<path>snf/content-classification/technical-integration/integration</path>
-		<dc:comment>the stipulation that re-used and created data are of the same type (= and thus capable to be integrated) is problematic, since this implies properties of the  data that are not a given. May be this shoud be reformulated to: Is the connection between re-used and created data ensured? (which goes into the provenance realm)</dc:comment>
+		<dc:comment>The stipulation that re-used and created data are of the same type (= and thus capable to be integrated) is problematic, since this implies properties of the  data that are not a given. May be this shoud be reformulated to: Is the connection between re-used and created data ensured? (which goes into the provenance realm)</dc:comment>
 		<attribute dc:uri="https://rdmorganiser.github.io/terms/domain/project/dataset/integration"/>
 		<questionset dc:uri="https://rdmorganiser.github.io/terms/questions/snf/content-classification/technical-integration"/>
 		<is_collection>False</is_collection>