Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make badges section a paragraph that pkgdown can recognize #43

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 22, 2019
Merged

Make badges section a paragraph that pkgdown can recognize #43

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 22, 2019

Conversation

maelle
Copy link
Member

@maelle maelle commented Jun 19, 2019

For pkgdown to recognize the badges paragraph and put it in the sidebar as "Dev status" (see e.g. https://docs.ropensci.org/ropenaq/) it needs to be a paragraph, and to be even more certain it'll be recognized I've added the badges paragraph limits that pkgdown uses when the badges paragraph isn't the first paragraph (although here it's the first paragraph).

But maybe you don't want that sidebar thing. :-)

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jun 19, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #43 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##           master    #43   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage     100%   100%           
=====================================
  Files          11     11           
  Lines         729    729           
=====================================
  Hits          729    729

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 120157d...5fe2578. Read the comment docs.

@ThierryO ThierryO merged commit 9233a59 into ropensci:master Jun 22, 2019
@ThierryO
Copy link
Member

Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants