Assoc uses Identity formatter if any value is nil #450
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The existing assoc formatter has logic to identify the case where a value is nil (in a Ruby-3.1 style hash) and preserve the existing formatting. For example:
{ first:, "second" => "value" }
is correctly left as-is.However, this logic only worked if the first assoc in the container had the nil value - if a later assoc had a nil value, the Identity formatter might not be chosen which could cause the formatter to generate invalid Ruby code.
As an example, this code:
{ "first" => "value", second: }
would be turned into{ "first" => "value", :second => }
.This patch pulls the nil value check up to the top of
HashKeyFormatter.for
to ensure it takes precendence over any other formatting selections. The fixtures have been updated to cover both cases (nil value in first position, nil value in last position).Fixes #446