Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: recognize --failonwarnings+ and --failonwarnings- #1576

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

naglis
Copy link
Contributor

@naglis naglis commented Nov 28, 2024

Fixes #1575

Although I don't understand the purpose of the extra + or - - i.e. does it not simply repeat what specifying --failonwarnings and omitting --failonwarnings would achieve?

@rdeltour
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the PR @naglis!

Yeah, I'm not sure for how long we've had this option and it's been documented this way, but I agree that having both --failonwarnings+ and --failonwarnings- looks a bit odd.

I'll close this PR and will create another one to keep only a --failonwarnings option (which matches the current CLI anyways).

@rdeltour rdeltour self-assigned this Dec 28, 2024
@rdeltour rdeltour added the status: wontfix The issue is rejected due to limitations (of scope or dev resources) label Dec 28, 2024
@rdeltour rdeltour closed this Dec 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
status: wontfix The issue is rejected due to limitations (of scope or dev resources)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

epubcheck 5.1.0 does not recognize --failonwarnings+, nor --failonwarnings-
2 participants