capital letters in refs #119
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
domel
added
the
spec:editorial
afs
reviewed
Sep 21, 2023
spec/index.html
Outdated
| @@ -4582,7 +4582,7 @@ <h4>Descriptions of Resources</h4> | |||
| </div> | |||
| </div> | |||
| <p>which includes the blank node closure for the | |||
| <a data-cite="vcard-rdf#" class="inform">vCard vocabulary</a> <code>vcard:N</code>. | |||
| vCard vocabulary <code>vcard:N</code>. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please can be have a link to the vCard vocabulary here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
OK, so why not link also to FOAF?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@afs And the second question, why is this a normative reference?
rubensworks
approved these changes
Sep 21, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good! Except for the removal of the vCard link as raised by @afs.
Tpt
reviewed
Sep 21, 2023
| requirements identified by the RDF Data Access Working Group in [[rdf-dawg-uc]], | ||
| the SPARQL 1.1 Working Group in [[sparql-features]], and the RDF-star Working Group. | ||
| requirements identified by the RDF Data Access Working Group in [[RDF-DAWG-UC]], | ||
| the SPARQL 1.1 Working Group in [[SPARQL-FEATURES]], and the RDF-star Working Group. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Genuine question: do we want these to be normative references?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@Tpt Agree. The problem is that Informative references are not generated. I don't know why, but I suggest unifying the capital letter issue, and let's clean the HTML/ReSpec in a different PR.
Tpt
approved these changes
Sep 21, 2023
| requirements identified by the RDF Data Access Working Group in [[rdf-dawg-uc]], | ||
| the SPARQL 1.1 Working Group in [[sparql-features]], and the RDF-star Working Group. | ||
| requirements identified by the RDF Data Access Working Group in [[RDF-DAWG-UC]], | ||
| the SPARQL 1.1 Working Group in [[SPARQL-FEATURES]], and the RDF-star Working Group. |
hartig
approved these changes
Sep 21, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
remove vCard from References - now vCard vocab is treated the same as FOAF vocab💥 Error: 500 Internal Server Error 💥
PR Preview failed to build. (Last tried on Sep 21, 2023, 4:31 PM UTC).
More
PR Preview relies on a number of web services to run. There seems to be an issue with the following one:
🚨 Spec Generator - Spec Generator is the web service used to build specs that rely on ReSpec.
🔗 Related URL
If you don't have enough information above to solve the error by yourself (or to understand to which web service the error is related to, if any), please file an issue.