Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
WG and TF updates #1018
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
WG and TF updates #1018
Changes from 19 commits
589b8a1
6fe1172
ecc93ab
e0cd2b6
62d1b1e
7c1651f
57d3591
0e03f5f
39bfe65
f891d68
026dca8
5dc1f1d
dbbfc26
84c78ab
89fe0ca
e6f0446
94872f8
f2c6617
b01f2ca
6385b1d
9235172
39ec694
415272d
12cbc80
f25d218
a2d08bb
a64a1cc
a979940
abaf85a
56a0c18
40c4dec
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Again this seems to have crept in, although I think in this case it is needed. The trouble is where to put it. Not really in 'Current work'. Not sure it fits anywhere in new structure. Closest might be 'Contribute to the work'. Open to ideas.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I did think the information about who funds the work sits best under 'current work, since it's related.
But if that doesn't make sense, then how about we place it under 'Charter and funding'?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, I think it needs to be separate from the Charter... not that I am being helpful with alternative ideas!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could place the information under a new h2 heading called 'About the work'. Under that heading will be two h3 headings:
I've mocked this up on the ARIA WG page that I committed this morning.
Or we could place the information under its own heading, 'Funding', after 'Publications and copyright'?
I don't think the funding information sits logically under 'Contribute to the work' because this is just information about the group (how it is funded) and not a call to action (i.e. to contribute funding), like the other items in this section.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think it should be close to the 'Current work'. Even having a 'funding' section doesn't make sense to me. If you take it out for the moment and then we can discuss in New Year - we could publish without it and then fix following discussion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Will do. This information was removed by a reviewer in the original mock up of the proposed design, so perhaps the information isn't needed on this page and is more appropriate on the 'Sponsor WAI page'?