-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WIP] Nearest Extreme Point Oracle variant #86
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
basically implements https://arxiv.org/pdf/2102.02029.pdf -> not done yet. need to change theory also to be more useful |
@@ -162,6 +163,14 @@ function fw( | |||
(t, primal, primal - dual_gap, dual_gap, (time_ns() - time_start) / 1.0e9), | |||
) | |||
end | |||
|
|||
# build-in NEP here | |||
if nep === true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if nep === true | |
if nep |
just checking the boolean directly
looking quickly at the paper, doesn't this need new LMOs? |
no for e.g., 0-1 problems or feasible regions with fixed norms as it can then be simulated via the LMO. see my implementation. This is actually quite smart as usually we would not pay any attention to „where“ we are but this one does. I can explain tomorrow.
Best,
Sebastian
…On 14. Feb 2021, 23:01 +0100, Mathieu Besançon ***@***.***>, wrote:
looking quickly at the paper, doesn't this need new LMOs?
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
|
@pokutta I think you have merged this into another branch that got merged into master, it is already there - it is not quite ready because of the interfacing as the gradient change depends on the iteration. i will fix it for vanilla FW today. |
No description provided.