-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Final adjustments and corrections for schema validation #2049
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The change to skosConcept.json
looks good but we have to discuss the id
for DDC-Sachgruppen der ZDB.
@@ -296,8 +296,10 @@ do list(path:"084??", "var":"$i") | |||
if any_match("$j","\\d{3}(\\.\\d{1,3})?|[BKS]") | |||
if any_equal("$i.q","DE-600") | |||
add_field("subject[].$last.source.label","DDC-Sachgruppen der ZDB") | |||
add_field("subject[].$last.source.id","https://zeitschriftendatenbank.de/fileadmin/user_upload/ZDB/pdf/zdbformat/5080.pdf") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Interesting choice of id
for this source. While I like the pragmatism, this sets a new precedent linking to the description of a controlled vocabulary in a documentation PDF. As I have no better idea, I guess we can leave it for now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
On the other hand, we should probably better leave out the id
field and add the documentation link in another field, e.g. seeAlso
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I already had a bad feeling a while ago about id: #1848 (comment)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But we decided off board to go on for a lack of a better id.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, then let's go. +1
See #1340
This PR: